FTCA vs. LVHD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FTCA (Franklin California Municipal Income ETF) and LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTCA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. FTCA is actively managed, while LVHD is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTCA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.

Performance

FTCA vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin California Municipal Income ETF (FTCA) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCA achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 13.03% return.

FTCA

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.75%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 6M: 3.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LVHD

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 13.03%
• 6M: 12.46%
• 1Y: 16.96%
• 3Y*: 11.07%
• 5Y*: 7.77%
• 10Y*: 8.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCA vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTCA Franklin California Municipal Income ETF	3.15%	-0.08%
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	13.03%	-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCA and LVHD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

FTCA vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LVHD

LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 56
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 53
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCA vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin California Municipal Income ETF (FTCA) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTCA	LVHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.72	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.53	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.76	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.87	—

Drawdowns

FTCA vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCA drawdown since its inception was -2.92%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCA and LVHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTCA	LVHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.92%	-37.32%	+34.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-4.03%	+3.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.48%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTCA	LVHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.40%	9.91%	-6.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.40%	12.92%	-9.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.40%	15.53%	-12.13%

FTCA vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTCA vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

FTCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than LVHD's 3.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FTCA Franklin California Municipal Income ETF	2.32%	0.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	3.21%	3.35%	4.23%	3.55%	3.30%	2.56%	3.27%	3.30%	3.82%	3.33%	2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTCA and LVHD in my portfolio?

FTCA and LVHD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTCA or LVHD?

On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTCA or LVHD?

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTCA or LVHD?

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 2.32% for FTCA.

What is the main difference between FTCA and LVHD?

FTCA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while LVHD is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTCA and 0.27% for LVHD.