FTA vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTA (First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTA is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTA returned 11.03%/yr vs 18.77%/yr for SCHG. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

FTA vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FTA has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.03%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.

FTA

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: 10.98%
• 6M: 11.99%
• 1Y: 26.91%
• 3Y*: 16.27%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: 11.03%

SCHG

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 25.02%
• 5Y*: 15.59%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTA vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	10.98%	14.94%	10.13%	10.08%	-3.73%	29.32%	-0.38%	24.73%	-13.63%	18.47%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.42%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FTA and SCHG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between FTA and SCHG has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FTA vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTA	SCHG
Financial Services	19.7%	6.7%
Utilities	13.3%	0.4%
Healthcare	10.6%	7.7%
Energy	9.6%	0.8%
Industrials	9.6%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	12.7%
Technology	8.0%	46.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.9%	1.7%
Real Estate	5.9%	0.5%
Communication Services	4.3%	16.0%
Basic Materials	2.7%	1.4%

Return for Risk

FTA vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTA

FTA Risk / Return Rank: 77
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 83

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTA vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTA	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	1.60	+0.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	2.18	+1.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.28	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.26	1.51	+3.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.76	5.04	+11.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTA vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTA and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTA	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	1.60	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.70	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.87	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.84	-0.46

Drawdowns

FTA vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTA	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.45%	-34.59%	-27.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.13%	-16.41%	+11.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.73%	-23.39%	+4.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.80%	-34.59%	+14.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.97%	-34.59%	-10.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-1.78%	+1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.04%	-5.20%	-3.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.61%	4.90%	-3.29%

Volatility

FTA vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) is 2.63%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that FTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTA	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	3.61%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.44%	11.62%	-4.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.56%	15.50%	-3.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.26%	22.27%	-6.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.96%	21.55%	-1.59%

FTA vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTA vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.68%	1.89%	2.02%	2.10%	2.15%	1.54%	2.03%	1.88%	2.28%	1.53%	1.56%	2.05%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTA and SCHG in my portfolio?

FTA and SCHG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTA or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to FTA (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTA dropped -62.45% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, FTA or SCHG?

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.77% vs 11.03% for FTA. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FTA has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTA or SCHG?

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTA or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTA or SCHG?

FTA has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between FTA and SCHG?

FTA is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.