FTA vs. SPY
FTA (First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTA is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTA returned 11.55%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
FTA vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FTA has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 11.55%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
FTA
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 25.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
FTA vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 11.25% | 14.94% | 10.13% | 10.08% | -3.73% | 29.32% | -0.38% | 24.73% | -13.63% | 18.47% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTA and SPY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FTA and SPY has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FTA vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTA
SPY
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
FTA
SPY
Utilities
FTA
SPY
Energy
FTA
SPY
Healthcare
FTA
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
FTA
SPY
Technology
FTA
SPY
Industrials
FTA
SPY
Real Estate
FTA
SPY
Consumer Defensive
FTA
SPY
Communication Services
FTA
SPY
Basic Materials
FTA
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTA vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
FTA
SPY
FTA vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTA | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.03 | 3.01 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.86 | 13.54 | +2.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTA vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTA | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.45% | -55.19% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.13% | -8.88% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.73% | -18.76% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.80% | -24.50% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.97% | -33.72% | -11.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -1.75% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.01% | -9.04% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 1.97% | -0.34% |
Volatility
FTA vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) is 3.34%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that FTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTA | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 4.64% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 9.75% | -2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.74% | 12.43% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 17.14% | -0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.97% | 17.99% | +1.98% |
FTA vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTA vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.67% | 1.89% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.54% | 2.03% | 1.88% | 2.28% | 1.53% | 1.56% | 2.05% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTA and SPY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to FTA (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTA dropped -62.45% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 11.55% for FTA. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FTA has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 11.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.
FTA has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
FTA is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.09% for SPY.
FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTA and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer