PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTGX vs. FDSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTGX vs. FDSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTGX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than FDSCX's 16.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTGX has underperformed FDSCX with an annualized return of 1.03%, while FDSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


FSTGX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.10%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*
1.03%

FDSCX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
16.09%
6M
14.16%
1Y
39.37%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTGX vs. FDSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTGX
Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund
-0.05%6.00%2.24%3.88%-8.76%-2.28%5.46%4.84%1.20%0.98%
FDSCX
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund
16.09%14.33%14.51%19.46%-18.28%24.76%21.76%30.42%-8.90%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTGX and FDSCX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 1995

-0.17

The correlation between FSTGX and FDSCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTGX vs. FDSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTGX
FSTGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FDSCX
FDSCX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FDSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTGX vs. FDSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTGXFDSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

3.91

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

15.22

-10.10

FSTGX vs. FDSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the FDSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTGX and FDSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTGXFDSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.21

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.46

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.59

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.42

+0.79

Drawdowns

FSTGX vs. FDSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTGX drawdown since its inception was -13.66%, smaller than the maximum FDSCX drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTGX and FDSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTGXFDSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.66%

-65.47%

+51.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.89%

-10.04%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.97%

-27.42%

+24.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.54%

-30.56%

+18.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.66%

-38.43%

+24.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-1.62%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-11.22%

+9.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

2.57%

-1.93%

Volatility

FSTGX vs. FDSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) is 0.77%, while Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that FSTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTGXFDSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

5.17%

-4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.81%

13.32%

-11.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64%

17.85%

-15.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.10%

21.63%

-17.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

21.87%

-18.49%

FSTGX vs. FDSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FDSCX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTGX vs. FDSCX - Dividend Comparison

FSTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than FDSCX's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSCX
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund
0.62%0.72%2.71%0.23%0.12%10.85%1.40%2.13%22.39%10.02%1.63%7.06%
FSTGX
Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund
3.15%3.04%2.94%2.12%0.99%0.77%2.65%1.85%1.84%1.47%1.52%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTGX and FDSCX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDSCX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to FSTGX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTGX dropped -13.66% vs FDSCX's -65.47%.

FDSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTGX and FDSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer