FDSCX vs. FCPGX
FDSCX (Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund) and FCPGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FDSCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FCPGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FDSCX returned 13.76%/yr vs 15.78%/yr for FCPGX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FDSCX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FCPGX.
Performance
FDSCX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDSCX achieves a 21.14% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 25.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FDSCX has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 13.76%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.78% annualized return.
FDSCX
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 21.14%
- 6M
- 18.35%
- 1Y
- 42.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
FCPGX
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- YTD
- 25.26%
- 6M
- 21.54%
- 1Y
- 44.87%
- 3Y*
- 22.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
FDSCX vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDSCX Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund | 21.14% | 14.33% | 14.51% | 19.46% | -18.28% | 24.76% | 21.76% | 30.42% | -8.90% | 11.25% |
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | 25.26% | 11.20% | 20.56% | 19.02% | -25.34% | 10.50% | 36.41% | 36.31% | -4.57% | 28.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDSCX and FCPGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FDSCX and FCPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDSCX vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank
FDSCX
FCPGX
FDSCX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDSCX | FCPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.34 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 3.52 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.93 | 14.02 | +2.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDSCX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDSCX drawdown since its inception was -65.47%, which is greater than FCPGX's maximum drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDSCX and FCPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDSCX | FCPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.47% | -59.11% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.04% | -13.12% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.42% | -28.69% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.56% | -39.04% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.43% | -39.04% | +0.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.21% | -10.68% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.28% | -0.68% |
Volatility
FDSCX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) is 6.16%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that FDSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDSCX | FCPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | 7.84% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.01% | 17.31% | -3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 22.24% | -3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.71% | 23.68% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 22.94% | -1.01% |
FDSCX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDSCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDSCX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison
FDSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than FCPGX's 5.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | 5.10% | 6.38% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.27% | 8.19% | 5.31% | 14.35% | 6.88% | 1.53% | 4.32% |
FDSCX Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund | 0.59% | 0.72% | 2.71% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 10.85% | 1.40% | 2.13% | 22.39% | 10.02% | 1.63% | 7.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FDSCX and FCPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FCPGX has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to FDSCX (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDSCX dropped -65.47% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.
FDSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDSCX and FCPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer