FDSCX vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
FDSCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 28, 1993. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FDSCX or IWM.
Correlation
The correlation between FDSCX and IWM is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FDSCX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FDSCX:
0.64
IWM:
0.53
FDSCX:
1.01
IWM:
0.89
FDSCX:
1.12
IWM:
1.11
FDSCX:
0.62
IWM:
0.58
FDSCX:
3.61
IWM:
2.82
FDSCX:
3.37%
IWM:
3.93%
FDSCX:
19.15%
IWM:
20.92%
FDSCX:
-69.56%
IWM:
-59.05%
FDSCX:
-11.89%
IWM:
-9.03%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FDSCX having a 11.23% return and IWM slightly lower at 10.83%. Over the past 10 years, FDSCX has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 5.16%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.75% annualized return.
FDSCX
11.23%
-7.59%
4.74%
14.28%
7.85%
5.16%
IWM
10.83%
-4.39%
10.69%
13.33%
7.17%
7.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDSCX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDSCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FDSCX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FDSCX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
FDSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.47% | 7.52% | 0.37% | 0.06% |
iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
FDSCX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDSCX drawdown since its inception was -69.56%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDSCX and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FDSCX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 6.06%. This indicates that FDSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.