PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTGX vs. FTHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTGX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTGX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than FTHRX's -0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTGX has underperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 1.01%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.00% annualized return.


FSTGX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.37%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.20%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
3.58%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
1.01%

FTHRX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.41%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
0.26%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*
2.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTGX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTGX
Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund
-0.05%6.00%2.24%3.88%-8.76%-2.28%5.46%4.84%1.20%0.98%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.04%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTGX and FTHRX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 1988

0.88

The correlation between FSTGX and FTHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTGX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTGX
FSTGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTGX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTGXFTHRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.73

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.46

4.83

-0.37

FSTGX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTGX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTGX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTGX drawdown since its inception was -13.66%, smaller than the maximum FTHRX drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTGX and FTHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTGXFTHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.66%

-19.01%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.89%

-2.11%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.97%

-2.68%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.54%

-13.18%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.66%

-13.25%

-0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-1.28%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-3.06%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.75%

-0.06%

Volatility

FSTGX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) have volatilities of 0.87% and 0.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTGXFTHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

0.89%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.88%

2.08%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63%

2.78%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.11%

4.03%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

3.40%

-0.02%

FSTGX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSTGX and FTHRX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

FSTGX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

FSTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than FTHRX's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTGX
Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund
3.15%3.04%2.94%2.12%0.99%0.77%2.65%1.85%1.84%1.47%1.52%1.69%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.70%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FSTGX and FTHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTHRX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to FSTGX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTGX dropped -13.66% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

FTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTGX and FTHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer