FDSCX vs. LAGWX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX).
FDSCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 28, 1993. LAGWX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Oct 10, 1973.
Performance
FDSCX vs. LAGWX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDSCX vs. LAGWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDSCX Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund | 4.16% | 14.33% | 14.51% | 19.46% | -18.28% | 24.76% | 21.76% | 30.42% | -8.90% | 11.25% |
LAGWX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund | -0.55% | 14.37% | 21.89% | 8.50% | -36.09% | -2.77% | 72.40% | 31.47% | 4.52% | 29.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDSCX achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than LAGWX's -0.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDSCX having a 12.01% annualized return and LAGWX not far behind at 11.97%.
FDSCX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 30.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
LAGWX
- 1D
- 6.25%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 38.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- -2.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDSCX vs. LAGWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDSCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than LAGWX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDSCX vs. LAGWX — Risk / Return Rank
FDSCX
LAGWX
FDSCX vs. LAGWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDSCX | LAGWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 1.89 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 2.50 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 9.02 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDSCX | LAGWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | -0.07 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.44 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.48 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDSCX and LAGWX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDSCX vs. LAGWX - Dividend Comparison
FDSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while LAGWX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDSCX Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund | 0.69% | 0.72% | 2.71% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 10.85% | 1.40% | 2.13% | 22.39% | 10.02% | 1.63% | 7.06% |
LAGWX Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.60% | 9.67% | 22.87% | 33.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.03% |
Drawdowns
FDSCX vs. LAGWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDSCX drawdown since its inception was -65.47%, which is greater than LAGWX's maximum drawdown of -60.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDSCX and LAGWX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDSCX | LAGWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.47% | -60.31% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.84% | -14.72% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.56% | -51.25% | +20.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.43% | -54.38% | +15.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.45% | -21.67% | +15.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.28% | -17.11% | +5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 4.07% | -0.80% |
Volatility
FDSCX vs. LAGWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) is 7.99%, while Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX) has a volatility of 12.67%. This indicates that FDSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAGWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDSCX | LAGWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 12.67% | -4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.50% | 20.98% | -7.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.44% | 28.57% | -6.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 27.52% | -5.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 27.01% | -5.19% |