FDSCX vs. LAGWX

In the year-to-date period, FDSCX achieves a -10.65% return, which is significantly higher than LAGWX's -14.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FDSCX has outperformed LAGWX with an annualized return of 3.43%, while LAGWX has yielded a comparatively lower -2.23% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FDSCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than LAGWX's 0.93% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FDSCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the LAGWX Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDSCX and LAGWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FDSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than LAGWX's 0.03% yield.

The maximum FDSCX drawdown since its inception was -69.56%, which is greater than LAGWX's maximum drawdown of -64.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDSCX and LAGWX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) is 14.50%, while Lord Abbett Developing Growth Fund (LAGWX) has a volatility of 15.78%. This indicates that FDSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAGWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.