PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDSCX vs. FCPVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDSCX vs. FCPVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDSCX achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly lower than FCPVX's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FDSCX has outperformed FCPVX with an annualized return of 12.74%, while FCPVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.89% annualized return.


FDSCX

1D
-0.86%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
14.98%
6M
15.55%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
12.74%

FCPVX

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.04%
YTD
16.85%
6M
16.40%
1Y
34.76%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDSCX vs. FCPVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDSCX
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund
14.98%14.33%14.51%19.46%-18.28%24.76%21.76%30.42%-8.90%11.25%
FCPVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
16.85%8.13%9.41%17.77%-13.07%38.08%11.18%20.86%-15.47%12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FDSCX and FCPVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2004

0.94

The correlation between FDSCX and FCPVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDSCX vs. FCPVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDSCX
FDSCX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FDSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPVX
FCPVX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FCPVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDSCX vs. FCPVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDSCXFCPVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.27

1.91

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

2.86

+0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.33

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

3.22

+0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.46

11.25

+4.22

FDSCX vs. FCPVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the FCPVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDSCX and FCPVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDSCXFCPVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.91

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.37

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.49

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.46

-0.04

Drawdowns

FDSCX vs. FCPVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDSCX drawdown since its inception was -65.47%, which is greater than FCPVX's maximum drawdown of -57.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDSCX and FCPVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDSCXFCPVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.47%

-57.65%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-10.31%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.42%

-23.81%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.56%

-23.81%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.43%

-44.59%

+6.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-2.42%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-7.97%

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.95%

-0.38%

Volatility

FDSCX vs. FCPVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) is 5.16%, while Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that FDSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDSCXFCPVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

5.76%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

12.60%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

17.80%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

20.94%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

22.35%

-0.48%

FDSCX vs. FCPVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDSCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPVX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDSCX vs. FCPVX - Dividend Comparison

FDSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than FCPVX's 8.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCPVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
8.69%10.15%6.13%5.20%5.92%7.95%0.46%3.49%36.44%3.64%7.12%11.09%
FDSCX
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund
0.62%0.72%2.71%0.23%0.12%10.85%1.40%2.13%22.39%10.02%1.63%7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FDSCX and FCPVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCPVX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to FDSCX (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDSCX dropped -65.47% vs FCPVX's -57.65%.

FDSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDSCX and FCPVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer