FSTA vs. PBJ
FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - FSTA tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index while PBJ tracks the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSTA returned 7.72%/yr vs 5.00%/yr for PBJ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PBJ.
Performance
FSTA vs. PBJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 7.00% return, which is significantly higher than PBJ's 3.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has outperformed PBJ with an annualized return of 7.72%, while PBJ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.00% annualized return.
FSTA
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 7.00%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
PBJ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- 3.69%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- -0.53%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
FSTA vs. PBJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 7.00% | 1.82% | 13.31% | 2.29% | -1.72% | 17.44% | 10.96% | 26.84% | -8.49% | 12.71% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 3.69% | -1.86% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 3.14% | 26.88% | 5.53% | 17.50% | -11.21% | 1.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTA and PBJ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FSTA and PBJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
FSTA vs. PBJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSTA
PBJ
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
FSTA
PBJ
Consumer Cyclical
FSTA
PBJ
Industrials
FSTA
PBJ
Basic Materials
FSTA
PBJ
Healthcare
FSTA
PBJ
-
Communication Services
FSTA
-
PBJ
-
Energy
FSTA
-
PBJ
-
Financial Services
FSTA
-
PBJ
Real Estate
FSTA
-
PBJ
-
Technology
FSTA
-
PBJ
-
Utilities
FSTA
-
PBJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSTA vs. PBJ — Risk / Return Rank
FSTA
PBJ
FSTA vs. PBJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSTA | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.00 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | -0.04 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | -0.10 | +1.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSTA vs. PBJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum PBJ drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and PBJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTA | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | -39.15% | +14.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -12.48% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.76% | -12.99% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.58% | -15.81% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.13% | -28.49% | +3.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.50% | -8.85% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | -5.39% | +1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 5.39% | -0.70% |
Volatility
FSTA vs. PBJ - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) at 3.96%. This indicates that FSTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSTA | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 3.96% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 9.27% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.70% | 12.67% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.15% | 13.76% | -0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 15.13% | -0.53% |
FSTA vs. PBJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PBJ's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSTA vs. PBJ - Dividend Comparison
FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than PBJ's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.24% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 1.93% | 1.83% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 1.82% | 0.90% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 0.70% | 1.56% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSTA and PBJ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSTA has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to PBJ (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs PBJ's -39.15%.
On 10-year performance, FSTA leads with 7.72% vs 5.00% for PBJ. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PBJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FSTA has performed better with a 7.72% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PBJ.
FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.93% for PBJ.
FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.63% for PBJ.
FSTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSTA and PBJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer