FSTA vs. PBJ
FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and PBJ (Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - FSTA tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index while PBJ tracks the Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSTA returned 7.47%/yr vs 4.93%/yr for PBJ. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PBJ.
Performance
FSTA vs. PBJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly higher than PBJ's 9.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has outperformed PBJ with an annualized return of 7.47%, while PBJ has yielded a comparatively lower 4.93% annualized return.
FSTA
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 7.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
PBJ
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 3.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 4.93%
FSTA vs. PBJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 9.78% | 1.82% | 13.31% | 2.29% | -1.72% | 17.44% | 10.96% | 26.84% | -8.49% | 12.71% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 9.17% | -1.86% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 3.14% | 26.88% | 5.53% | 17.50% | -11.21% | 1.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTA and PBJ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FSTA and PBJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
FSTA vs. PBJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSTA
PBJ
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
FSTA
PBJ
Consumer Cyclical
FSTA
PBJ
Basic Materials
FSTA
PBJ
Industrials
FSTA
PBJ
Technology
FSTA
PBJ
-
Healthcare
FSTA
PBJ
-
Communication Services
FSTA
-
PBJ
-
Energy
FSTA
-
PBJ
-
Financial Services
FSTA
-
PBJ
Real Estate
FSTA
-
PBJ
-
Utilities
FSTA
-
PBJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSTA vs. PBJ — Risk / Return Rank
FSTA
PBJ
FSTA vs. PBJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSTA | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.05 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 0.26 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.46 | 0.58 | +0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSTA vs. PBJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum PBJ drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and PBJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTA | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | -39.15% | +14.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -12.48% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.76% | -12.99% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.58% | -15.81% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.13% | -28.49% | +3.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.10% | -4.04% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -5.40% | +1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.85% | 5.56% | -0.71% |
Volatility
FSTA vs. PBJ - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) at 4.50%. This indicates that FSTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSTA | PBJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 4.50% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 9.62% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 12.80% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 13.80% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 15.11% | -0.50% |
FSTA vs. PBJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PBJ's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSTA vs. PBJ - Dividend Comparison
FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than PBJ's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.18% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
PBJ Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF | 1.26% | 1.83% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 1.82% | 0.90% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 0.70% | 1.56% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSTA and PBJ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSTA has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to PBJ (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs PBJ's -39.15%.
On 10-year performance, FSTA leads with 7.47% vs 4.93% for PBJ. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PBJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FSTA has performed better with a 7.47% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PBJ.
FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.26% for PBJ.
FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while PBJ tracks Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.63% for PBJ.
FSTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSTA and PBJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer