PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTA vs. PSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTA vs. PSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly lower than PSL's 8.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSTA having a 7.51% annualized return and PSL not far ahead at 7.82%.


FSTA

1D
-0.27%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
5.16%
6M
3.92%
1Y
0.25%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
7.51%

PSL

1D
-0.00%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
8.48%
6M
8.37%
1Y
-2.54%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTA vs. PSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
5.16%1.82%13.31%2.29%-1.72%17.44%10.96%26.84%-8.49%12.71%
PSL
Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF
8.48%-3.47%15.42%12.32%-7.76%6.88%18.15%14.16%0.92%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and PSL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.74

The correlation between FSTA and PSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSTA vs. PSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSTA
PSL

Consumer Defensive

97.3%
85.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
10.9%

Industrials

0.3%
1.5%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

1.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

FSTA
97.3%
PSL
85.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FSTA
1.8%
PSL
10.9%

Industrials

FSTA
0.3%
PSL
1.5%

Basic Materials

FSTA
0.3%
PSL

-

Healthcare

FSTA
0.0%
PSL

-

Communication Services

FSTA

-

PSL

-

Energy

FSTA

-

PSL

-

Financial Services

FSTA

-

PSL
1.8%

Real Estate

FSTA

-

PSL

-

Technology

FSTA

-

PSL

-

Utilities

FSTA

-

PSL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTA vs. PSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTA
FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

PSL
PSL Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSL Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTA vs. PSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTAPSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.02

-0.20

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.12

-0.18

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.98

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

-0.15

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.09

-0.33

+0.41

FSTA vs. PSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is higher than the PSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTA and PSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTAPSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

-0.20

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.23

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.48

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.55

+0.06

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. PSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum PSL drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and PSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTAPSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.13%

-41.58%

+16.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-13.64%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.76%

-13.64%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

-22.35%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.13%

-34.67%

+9.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.10%

-6.94%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-5.82%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

6.13%

-1.61%

Volatility

FSTA vs. PSL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) at 3.22%. This indicates that FSTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTAPSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.22%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

8.50%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

12.80%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.11%

15.15%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.56%

16.50%

-1.94%

FSTA vs. PSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PSL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTA vs. PSL - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than PSL's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
2.26%2.34%2.25%2.66%2.26%2.15%2.47%2.46%3.01%2.42%2.53%2.86%
PSL
Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF
0.85%0.93%0.60%1.37%1.98%1.24%0.80%0.47%0.75%0.34%2.08%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTA and PSL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTA has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to PSL (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs PSL's -41.58%.

On 10-year performance, PSL leads with 7.82% vs 7.51% for FSTA. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSL has performed better with a 7.82% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.85% for PSL.

FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PSL is Momentum. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.60% for PSL.

FSTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTA and PSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer