FSTA vs. PSL
FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while PSL is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSTA returned 7.51%/yr vs 7.82%/yr for PSL. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PSL.
Performance
FSTA vs. PSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly lower than PSL's 8.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSTA having a 7.51% annualized return and PSL not far ahead at 7.82%.
FSTA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 5.16%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- 0.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
PSL
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
FSTA vs. PSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 5.16% | 1.82% | 13.31% | 2.29% | -1.72% | 17.44% | 10.96% | 26.84% | -8.49% | 12.71% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 8.48% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTA and PSL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FSTA and PSL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
FSTA vs. PSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSTA
PSL
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
FSTA
PSL
Consumer Cyclical
FSTA
PSL
Industrials
FSTA
PSL
Basic Materials
FSTA
PSL
-
Healthcare
FSTA
PSL
-
Communication Services
FSTA
-
PSL
-
Energy
FSTA
-
PSL
-
Financial Services
FSTA
-
PSL
Real Estate
FSTA
-
PSL
-
Technology
FSTA
-
PSL
-
Utilities
FSTA
-
PSL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSTA vs. PSL — Risk / Return Rank
FSTA
PSL
FSTA vs. PSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSTA | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | -0.20 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.12 | -0.18 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.98 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | -0.15 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | -0.33 | +0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSTA | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | -0.20 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.23 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.48 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.55 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
FSTA vs. PSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum PSL drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and PSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTA | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | -41.58% | +16.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -13.64% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.76% | -13.64% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.58% | -22.35% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.13% | -34.67% | +9.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | -6.94% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -5.82% | +2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 6.13% | -1.61% |
Volatility
FSTA vs. PSL - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) at 3.22%. This indicates that FSTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSTA | PSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 3.22% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 8.50% | +1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.37% | 12.80% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 15.15% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 16.50% | -1.94% |
FSTA vs. PSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PSL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSTA vs. PSL - Dividend Comparison
FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than PSL's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.26% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSTA and PSL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSTA has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to PSL (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs PSL's -41.58%.
On 10-year performance, PSL leads with 7.82% vs 7.51% for FSTA. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSL has performed better with a 7.82% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.
FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.85% for PSL.
FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PSL is Momentum. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.60% for PSL.
FSTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSTA and PSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer