FSRPX vs. TMFC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FSRPX (Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio) and TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) are both funds - FSRPX is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while TMFC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index. Over the past 5 years, FSRPX returned 2.79%/yr vs 14.30%/yr for TMFC. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSRPX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TMFC.

Performance

FSRPX vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRPX achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly lower than TMFC's 8.46% return.

FSRPX

• 1D: 1.21%
• 1M: -0.74%
• 6M: -2.05%
• YTD: 4.45%
• 1Y: -2.31%
• 3Y*: 10.67%
• 5Y*: 2.79%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

TMFC

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 8.73%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 1Y: 20.15%
• 3Y*: 23.27%
• 5Y*: 14.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRPX vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio	4.45%	-4.15%	23.28%	26.94%	-29.44%	18.25%	44.27%	26.33%	-6.45%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	8.46%	19.55%	35.17%	47.04%	-30.86%	25.30%	42.00%	34.70%	-5.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRPX and TMFC is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between FSRPX and TMFC has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FSRPX vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRPX

FSRPX Risk / Return Rank: 2
FSRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FSRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FSRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FSRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FSRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

TMFC

TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 45
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRPX vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSRPX	TMFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	1.41	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.05	1.97	-2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.25	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	1.60	-1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.33	5.64	-5.97

FSRPX vs. TMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRPX and TMFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSRPX vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRPX drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, which is greater than TMFC's maximum drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRPX and TMFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSRPX	TMFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.75%	-33.06%	-22.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.79%	-12.64%	-5.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.58%	-20.06%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.01%	-33.06%	-5.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.27%	-1.09%	-8.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.09%	-6.72%	-2.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.28%	3.58%	+4.70%

Volatility

FSRPX vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) at 4.34%. This indicates that FSRPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSRPX	TMFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	4.34%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.99%	11.51%	+0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.68%	14.38%	+5.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.80%	20.52%	+2.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.63%	21.94%	-0.31%

FSRPX vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than TMFC's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSRPX vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

FSRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than TMFC's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio	6.56%	8.75%	12.41%	7.40%	2.90%	15.92%	6.82%	2.13%	2.17%	3.37%	0.14%	1.22%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	0.13%	0.14%	0.40%	0.26%	0.27%	0.23%	0.42%	0.50%	0.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSRPX and TMFC in my portfolio?

FSRPX and TMFC have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSRPX or TMFC?

FSRPX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to TMFC (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRPX dropped -55.75% vs TMFC's -33.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.