PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
FSRPX vs. RTH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

FSRPX vs. RTH

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH).

FSRPX is managed by Fidelity Investments. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985. RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSRPX or RTH.

Correlation

The correlation between FSRPX and RTH is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FSRPX vs. RTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FSRPX:

11.81%

RTH:

8.24%

Max Drawdown

FSRPX:

-0.66%

RTH:

-0.39%

Current Drawdown

FSRPX:

-0.16%

RTH:

-0.31%

Returns By Period

FSRPX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

RTH

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FSRPX vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.

FSRPX
Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio
RTH
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSRPX vs. RTH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FSRPX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSRPX is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSRPX is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSRPX is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSRPX is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSRPX is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSRPX is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
RTH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RTH is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RTH is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RTH is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RTH is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RTH is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RTH is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSRPX vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

FSRPX vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison

FSRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than RTH's 0.75% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSRPX
Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio		4.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RTH
VanEck Vectors Retail ETF		0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FSRPX vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRPX drawdown since its inception was -0.66%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRPX and RTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

FSRPX vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...