FSRPX vs. RTH
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH).
FSRPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985. RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Performance
FSRPX vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSRPX vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | -4.91% | -4.15% | 23.28% | 26.94% | -29.44% | 18.25% | 44.27% | 26.33% | 4.58% | 25.55% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.56% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRPX achieves a -4.91% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRPX has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of 11.47%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.65% annualized return.
FSRPX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- -4.91%
- 6M
- -14.41%
- 1Y
- -0.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
RTH
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 12.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 13.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSRPX vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSRPX vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank
FSRPX
RTH
FSRPX vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSRPX | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | 0.83 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.15 | 1.34 | -1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.17 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.49 | -1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 5.80 | -6.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSRPX | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 0.83 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.58 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.78 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.50 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRPX and RTH is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSRPX vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
FSRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%, more than RTH's 0.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | 9.20% | 8.75% | 12.41% | 7.40% | 2.90% | 15.92% | 6.82% | 2.13% | 2.17% | 3.37% | 0.14% | 1.22% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.96% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
Drawdowns
FSRPX vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRPX drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRPX and RTH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRPX | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.75% | -42.32% | -13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.79% | -9.02% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.01% | -25.00% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.01% | -25.00% | -14.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.40% | -5.86% | -11.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.09% | -7.38% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | 2.32% | +4.10% |
Volatility
FSRPX vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 4.49%. This indicates that FSRPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSRPX | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 4.49% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 8.84% | +7.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.42% | 14.78% | +8.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 16.75% | +5.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 17.53% | +4.03% |