Correlation
The correlation between FSRPX and RTH is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
FSRPX vs. RTH
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH).
FSRPX is managed by Fidelity Investments. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985. RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FSRPX or RTH.
Performance
FSRPX vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FSRPX:
0.42
RTH:
1.16
FSRPX:
0.74
RTH:
1.76
FSRPX:
1.10
RTH:
1.22
FSRPX:
0.40
RTH:
1.40
FSRPX:
1.19
RTH:
4.82
FSRPX:
7.49%
RTH:
4.02%
FSRPX:
21.04%
RTH:
16.43%
FSRPX:
-55.00%
RTH:
-41.80%
FSRPX:
-10.62%
RTH:
-3.08%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRPX achieves a -3.90% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 4.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSRPX having a 13.31% annualized return and RTH not far ahead at 13.34%.
FSRPX
-3.90%
2.67%
-5.03%
7.92%
13.20%
11.04%
13.31%
RTH
4.76%
2.14%
1.84%
18.09%
14.35%
13.76%
13.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSRPX vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FSRPX vs. RTH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FSRPX
RTH
FSRPX vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FSRPX vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
FSRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.74%, more than RTH's 0.74% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | 10.74% | 12.41% | 7.40% | 2.90% | 15.92% | 6.82% | 2.13% | 1.40% | 3.60% | 0.14% | 1.22% | 7.97% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.74% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% | 0.41% |
Drawdowns
FSRPX vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRPX drawdown since its inception was -55.00%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRPX and RTH.
Loading data...
Volatility
FSRPX vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 3.95%. This indicates that FSRPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...