FSRBX vs. SFPAX
FSRBX (Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio) and SFPAX (Saratoga Financial Service Fund) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSRBX returned 12.46%/yr vs 9.07%/yr for SFPAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSRBX charges 0.73%/yr vs 3.81%/yr for SFPAX.
Performance
FSRBX vs. SFPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, FSRBX has outperformed SFPAX with an annualized return of 12.46%, while SFPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.07% annualized return.
FSRBX
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 6.37%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- 28.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
SFPAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.05%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.07%
FSRBX vs. SFPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | 10.54% | 11.11% | 30.13% | 8.48% | -12.61% | 38.21% | -11.73% | 35.60% | -19.04% | 12.72% |
SFPAX Saratoga Financial Service Fund | 0.00% | 7.00% | 26.05% | 10.58% | -14.36% | 31.17% | -5.81% | 29.63% | -19.23% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRBX and SFPAX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSRBX and SFPAX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSRBX vs. SFPAX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRBX
SFPAX
FSRBX vs. SFPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) and Saratoga Financial Service Fund (SFPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSRBX | SFPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.33 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 2.72 | +1.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSRBX vs. SFPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRBX drawdown since its inception was -76.89%, which is greater than SFPAX's maximum drawdown of -71.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRBX and SFPAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRBX | SFPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.89% | -71.98% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.60% | -4.86% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.05% | -17.92% | -8.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.95% | -27.51% | -14.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.23% | -45.64% | -5.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -2.65% | +2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | -20.93% | +7.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.94% | 2.34% | +3.60% |
Volatility
FSRBX vs. SFPAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio (FSRBX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Saratoga Financial Service Fund (SFPAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that FSRBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSRBX | SFPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 0.00% | +5.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.33% | 3.50% | +13.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.82% | 9.55% | +13.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.79% | 18.80% | +7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.52% | 22.62% | +6.90% |
FSRBX vs. SFPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRBX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than SFPAX's 3.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSRBX vs. SFPAX - Dividend Comparison
FSRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while SFPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRBX Fidelity Select Banking Portfolio | 2.16% | 1.47% | 4.49% | 5.35% | 6.12% | 3.36% | 8.63% | 5.90% | 32.02% | 2.57% | 0.76% | 5.64% |
SFPAX Saratoga Financial Service Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.91% | 5.05% | 5.71% | 5.03% | 4.18% | 7.10% | 22.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSRBX and SFPAX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSRBX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to SFPAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRBX dropped -76.89% vs SFPAX's -71.98%.
FSRBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSRBX and SFPAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer