SFPAX vs. FLC
SFPAX (Saratoga Financial Service Fund) and FLC (Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SFPAX returned 9.07%/yr vs 4.61%/yr for FLC. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SFPAX charges 3.81%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for FLC.
Performance
SFPAX vs. FLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, SFPAX has outperformed FLC with an annualized return of 9.07%, while FLC has yielded a comparatively lower 4.61% annualized return.
SFPAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- 15.05%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.07%
FLC
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 6.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
SFPAX vs. FLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFPAX Saratoga Financial Service Fund | 0.00% | 7.00% | 26.05% | 10.58% | -14.36% | 31.17% | -5.81% | 29.63% | -19.23% | 19.28% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -1.76% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFPAX and FLC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2003 | 0.30 |
The correlation between SFPAX and FLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFPAX vs. FLC — Risk / Return Rank
SFPAX
FLC
SFPAX vs. FLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Financial Service Fund (SFPAX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFPAX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 0.81 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.72 | 2.50 | +0.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFPAX vs. FLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFPAX drawdown since its inception was -71.98%, smaller than the maximum FLC drawdown of -76.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFPAX and FLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFPAX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.98% | -76.79% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | -8.34% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.92% | -11.87% | -6.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | -40.14% | +12.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.64% | -55.27% | +9.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -5.16% | +2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.93% | -10.85% | -10.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.68% | -0.34% |
Volatility
SFPAX vs. FLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saratoga Financial Service Fund (SFPAX) is 0.00%, while Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) has a volatility of 1.76%. This indicates that SFPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFPAX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 1.76% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.50% | 6.13% | -2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.55% | 7.21% | +2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 14.07% | +4.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.62% | 22.04% | +0.58% |
SFPAX vs. FLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFPAX has a 3.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FLC's 1.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFPAX vs. FLC - Dividend Comparison
SFPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.44% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
SFPAX Saratoga Financial Service Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.91% | 5.05% | 5.71% | 5.03% | 4.18% | 7.10% | 22.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFPAX and FLC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLC has higher volatility (1.76%) compared to SFPAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFPAX dropped -71.98% vs FLC's -76.79%.
FLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFPAX and FLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer