PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSRAX vs. PALDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSRAX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class A (FSRAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSRAX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than PALDX's 7.39% return.


FSRAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.82%
1Y
16.14%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
5.48%

PALDX

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.30%
YTD
7.39%
6M
7.89%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSRAX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSRAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class A
8.56%10.09%5.58%4.32%-3.58%15.53%3.49%10.27%-4.26%1.80%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
7.39%13.62%18.96%18.90%-15.65%16.30%10.68%22.27%-4.12%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FSRAX and PALDX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between FSRAX and PALDX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSRAX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSRAX
FSRAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FSRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSRAX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class A (FSRAX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSRAXPALDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.49

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.94

3.43

+4.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.67

16.27

+14.40

FSRAX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSRAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is higher than the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSRAX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSRAXPALDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46

2.59

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.77

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.80

-0.25

Drawdowns

FSRAX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSRAX drawdown since its inception was -33.52%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRAX and PALDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSRAXPALDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.52%

-26.16%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.06%

-5.96%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.78%

-16.06%

+10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.89%

-20.47%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-0.46%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-4.09%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

1.25%

-0.72%

Volatility

FSRAX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class A (FSRAX) is 1.36%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that FSRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSRAXPALDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

2.31%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.75%

6.18%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.73%

7.91%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.93%

12.11%

-5.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.78%

12.69%

-5.91%

FSRAX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSRAX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSRAX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

FSRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than PALDX's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class A
3.91%4.45%4.56%5.04%7.08%5.16%2.02%2.83%9.13%2.30%2.08%1.44%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.05%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSRAX and PALDX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PALDX has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to FSRAX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRAX dropped -33.52% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

FSRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSRAX and PALDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer