PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSOL vs. SDCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSOL vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -41.01% return, which is significantly lower than SDCI's 28.92% return.


FSOL

1D
-4.73%
1M
-14.55%
YTD
-41.01%
6M
-48.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SDCI

1D
0.18%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
28.92%
6M
26.57%
1Y
40.79%
3Y*
23.74%
5Y*
20.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSOL vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FSOL and SDCI is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSOL vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSOL

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSOL vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FSOL vs. SDCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSOLSDCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.99

0.68

-1.67

Drawdowns

FSOL vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, which is greater than SDCI's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and SDCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSOLSDCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.54%

-45.79%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.54%

-3.04%

-47.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.21%

-11.58%

-17.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

Volatility

FSOL vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSOLSDCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.65%

16.83%

+54.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.65%

18.46%

+53.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.65%

17.08%

+54.57%

FSOL vs. SDCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SDCI's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSOL vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison

FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than SDCI's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FSOL
Fidelity Solana Fund
2.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
2.85%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSOL and SDCI have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SDCI.

SDCI has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 2.03% for FSOL.

FSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SDCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Wainwright, Inc.. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.70% for SDCI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSOL and SDCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer