FSOL vs. BTCZ
FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.89, they often move in opposite directions. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
FSOL vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -41.01% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 32.54% return.
FSOL
- 1D
- -4.73%
- 1M
- -14.55%
- YTD
- -41.01%
- 6M
- -48.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- 46.26%
- YTD
- 32.54%
- 6M
- 46.67%
- 1Y
- 55.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSOL vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | -41.01% | -11.84% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 32.54% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSOL and BTCZ is -0.89, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSOL vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
FSOL
BTCZ
FSOL vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSOL | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | -0.57 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
FSOL vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSOL | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.54% | -91.06% | +40.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.54% | -78.63% | +28.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.21% | -73.72% | +44.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.74% | — |
Volatility
FSOL vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSOL | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 68.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.65% | 87.46% | -15.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 97.12% | -25.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 97.12% | -25.47% |
FSOL vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSOL vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | 2.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSOL and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.
FSOL has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.95% for BTCZ.
Find the right allocation for FSOL and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer