PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSOL vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSOL vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -41.01% return, which is significantly lower than FBTC's -25.34% return.


FSOL

1D
-4.73%
1M
-14.55%
YTD
-41.01%
6M
-48.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBTC

1D
-2.65%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-25.34%
6M
-29.78%
1Y
-38.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSOL vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FSOL
Fidelity Solana Fund
-41.01%-11.84%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-25.34%-5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FSOL and FBTC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSOL vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSOL

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSOL vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FSOL vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSOLFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.99

0.30

-1.29

Drawdowns

FSOL vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, roughly equal to the maximum FBTC drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and FBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSOLFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.54%

-49.33%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.54%

-48.00%

-2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.21%

-16.01%

-13.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.41%

Volatility

FSOL vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSOLFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.65%

43.61%

+28.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.65%

50.13%

+21.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.65%

50.13%

+21.52%

FSOL vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSOL and FBTC have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSOL vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FSOL and FBTC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FSOL and FBTC have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

FSOL has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSOL and FBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer