FSOL vs. FETH
FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Fidelity. FSOL is actively managed, while FETH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FETH.
Performance
FSOL vs. FETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSOL having a -41.01% return and FETH slightly higher at -39.45%.
FSOL
- 1D
- -4.73%
- 1M
- -14.55%
- YTD
- -41.01%
- 6M
- -48.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FETH
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.77%
- 1Y
- -31.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSOL vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | -41.01% | -11.84% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -39.45% | -4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSOL and FETH is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSOL vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank
FSOL
FETH
FSOL vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSOL | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | -0.41 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
FSOL vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and FETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSOL | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.54% | -64.00% | +13.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -62.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.54% | -62.95% | +12.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.21% | -32.73% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 37.82% | — |
Volatility
FSOL vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSOL | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.65% | 68.50% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 72.27% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.65% | 72.27% | -0.62% |
FSOL vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FSOL vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison
FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% |
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSOL and FETH have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FSOL.
FSOL has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.00% for FETH.
Find the right allocation for FSOL and FETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer