FSOL vs. MLPR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FSOL (Fidelity Solana Fund) and MLPR (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - FSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Fidelity, while MLPR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index (150%). FSOL is actively managed, while MLPR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. FSOL charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MLPR.

Performance

FSOL vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -37.74% return, which is significantly lower than MLPR's 34.12% return.

FSOL

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: 2.64%
• 6M: -45.51%
• YTD: -37.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPR

• 1D: 2.37%
• 1M: 9.64%
• 6M: 25.41%
• YTD: 34.12%
• 1Y: 38.21%
• 3Y*: 31.62%
• 5Y*: 30.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSOL vs. MLPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund	-37.74%	-10.66%
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	34.12%	1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FSOL and MLPR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

FSOL vs. MLPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSOL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MLPR

MLPR Risk / Return Rank: 62
MLPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MLPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
MLPR Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MLPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
MLPR Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSOL vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSOL	MLPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.75	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.29	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.21	—

Drawdowns

FSOL vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -56.33%, which is greater than MLPR's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and MLPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSOL	MLPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.33%	-48.98%	-7.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.79%	-3.98%	-43.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.70%	-8.93%	-23.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FSOL	MLPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.32%	22.00%	+50.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.32%	29.37%	+42.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.32%	33.68%	+38.64%

FSOL vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSOL vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison

FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than MLPR's 9.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FSOL Fidelity Solana Fund	1.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	9.19%	10.85%	9.57%	10.08%	7.49%	10.69%	4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSOL and MLPR in my portfolio?

FSOL and MLPR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FSOL or MLPR?

On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSOL or MLPR?

FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MLPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSOL or MLPR?

MLPR has the higher dividend yield at 9.19%, compared with 1.93% for FSOL.

What is the main difference between FSOL and MLPR?

FSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MLPR is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.95% for MLPR.