PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSOL vs. DABS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSOL vs. DABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSOL achieves a -41.01% return, which is significantly lower than DABS's 0.88% return.


FSOL

1D
-4.73%
1M
-14.55%
YTD
-41.01%
6M
-48.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DABS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.22%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSOL vs. DABS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FSOL
Fidelity Solana Fund
-41.01%-11.84%
DABS
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF
0.88%-0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FSOL and DABS is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSOL vs. DABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSOL

DABS
DABS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSOL vs. DABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Solana Fund (FSOL) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FSOL vs. DABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSOLDABSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.99

2.05

-3.04

Drawdowns

FSOL vs. DABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, which is greater than DABS's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSOL and DABS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSOLDABSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.54%

-1.47%

-49.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.54%

-0.49%

-50.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.21%

-0.31%

-28.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

Volatility

FSOL vs. DABS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSOLDABSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.65%

2.49%

+69.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.65%

2.56%

+69.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.65%

2.56%

+69.09%

FSOL vs. DABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSOL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DABS's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSOL vs. DABS - Dividend Comparison

FSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than DABS's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM2025
DABS
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF
4.89%3.81%
FSOL
Fidelity Solana Fund
2.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSOL and DABS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DABS.

DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 2.03% for FSOL.

FSOL is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while DABS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FSOL and 0.40% for DABS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSOL and DABS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer