FSMD vs. KULR
FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) is Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index, while KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FSMD returned 9.34%/yr vs -29.09%/yr for KULR. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FSMD vs. KULR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSMD achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than KULR's 26.01% return.
FSMD
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 23.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- —
KULR
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 29.07%
- YTD
- 26.01%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- -60.49%
- 3Y*
- -11.82%
- 5Y*
- -29.09%
- 10Y*
- —
FSMD vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 13.60% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 26.40% | 8.94% | 8.81% |
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 26.01% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -84.58% | -56.52% | 87.76% | -2.00% | -25.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSMD and KULR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, FSMD and KULR have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSMD vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank
FSMD
KULR
FSMD vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSMD | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.94 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | -0.76 | +3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.05 | -0.99 | +11.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSMD | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | -0.57 | +2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | -0.23 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | -0.11 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
FSMD vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSMD drawdown since its inception was -40.67%, smaller than the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSMD and KULR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSMD | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.67% | -97.23% | +56.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -79.80% | +71.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.16% | -94.74% | +72.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -96.86% | +74.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -90.29% | +88.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -66.23% | +60.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 60.84% | -58.50% |
Volatility
FSMD vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) is 4.25%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 47.09%. This indicates that FSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSMD | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 47.09% | -42.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 76.46% | -64.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 106.05% | -90.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.50% | 126.05% | -107.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 126.51% | -105.09% |
Dividends
FSMD vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison
FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% |
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSMD and KULR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KULR has higher volatility (47.09%) compared to FSMD (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSMD dropped -40.67% vs KULR's -97.23%.
FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSMD and KULR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer