FSM vs. GDXJ

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSM having a 41.26% return and GDXJ slightly higher at 42.78%. Over the past 10 years, FSM has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 4.71%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSM and GDXJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.

The maximum FSM drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, roughly equal to the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSM and GDXJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) has a higher volatility of 20.26% compared to VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) at 17.70%. This indicates that FSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.