FSM vs. ASM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM).

Performance

FSM vs. ASM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FSM vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSM Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.	1.22%	128.67%	11.14%	2.93%	-3.85%	-52.67%	101.96%	12.09%	-30.27%	-7.61%
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.	1.77%	604.88%	68.13%	-22.95%	-21.01%	-33.77%	124.14%	-4.92%	-54.48%	-2.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FSM : $3.04B ASM : $1.04B
EPS FSM : $0.91 ASM : $0.17
PE Ratio FSM : 10.90 ASM : 37.39
PEG Ratio FSM : 0.16 ASM : 0.11
PS Ratio FSM : 3.01 ASM : 11.37
PB Ratio FSM : 1.81 ASM : 4.45
Total Revenue (TTM) FSM : $1.04B ASM : $88.12M
Gross Profit (TTM) FSM : $502.09M ASM : $44.14M
EBITDA (TTM) FSM : $670.30M ASM : $39.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSM achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than ASM's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FSM has underperformed ASM with an annualized return of 9.71%, while ASM has yielded a comparatively higher 20.13% annualized return.

FSM

• 1D: 6.09%
• 1M: -27.31%
• YTD: 1.22%
• 6M: 10.83%
• 1Y: 62.79%
• 3Y*: 37.50%
• 5Y*: 8.03%
• 10Y*: 9.71%

ASM

• 1D: 8.78%
• 1M: -34.30%
• YTD: 1.77%
• 6M: 20.38%
• 1Y: 243.48%
• 3Y*: 92.57%
• 5Y*: 37.41%
• 10Y*: 20.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FSM vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSM

FSM Risk / Return Rank: 74
FSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FSM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FSM Martin Ratio Rank: 80

ASM

ASM Risk / Return Rank: 93
ASM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ASM Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ASM Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ASM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ASM Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSM vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSM	ASM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	2.93	-1.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	3.03	-1.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.38	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	4.47	-2.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.57	13.63	-8.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSM vs. ASM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the ASM Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSM and ASM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSM	ASM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	2.93	-1.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.58	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.29	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.09	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between FSM and ASM is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FSM vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison

Neither FSM nor ASM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FSM vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSM drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, roughly equal to the maximum ASM drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSM and ASM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSM	ASM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.25%	-94.10%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.26%	-52.40%	+15.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.74%	-70.08%	-3.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.07%	-90.91%	+9.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.31%	-43.77%	+16.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.35%	-64.02%	+18.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.18%	17.20%	-6.02%

Volatility

FSM vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) is 20.19%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 28.16%. This indicates that FSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSM	ASM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.19%	28.16%	-7.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.88%	67.30%	-21.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.84%	83.71%	-22.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.92%	65.03%	-7.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.09%	70.32%	-10.23%

Financials

FSM vs. ASM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported a gross profit of 148.06M and revenue of 272.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.4%.

ASM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 13.45M and revenue of 26.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

FSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported an operating income of 121.35M and revenue of 272.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.6%.

ASM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 9.80M and revenue of 26.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.

FSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported a net income of 69.11M and revenue of 272.03M, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.

ASM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 10.62M and revenue of 26.44M, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.