PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FSM vs. SILV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FSMSILV
YTD Return17.62%45.50%
1Y Return34.72%78.46%
3Y Return (Ann)5.48%-0.59%
5Y Return (Ann)8.31%12.88%
Sharpe Ratio0.931.66
Sortino Ratio1.562.34
Omega Ratio1.191.27
Calmar Ratio0.681.46
Martin Ratio2.557.05
Ulcer Index19.38%12.33%
Daily Std Dev53.26%52.27%
Max Drawdown-92.25%-69.92%
Current Drawdown-52.41%-22.83%

Fundamentals


FSMSILV
Market Cap$1.44B$1.49B
EPS$0.07$0.71
PE Ratio65.5714.04
Total Revenue (TTM)$711.29M$199.10M
Gross Profit (TTM)$218.12M$115.83M
EBITDA (TTM)$218.71M$121.47M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between FSM and SILV is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FSM vs. SILV - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FSM achieves a 17.62% return, which is significantly lower than SILV's 45.50% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-15.14%
3.81%
FSM
SILV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSM vs. SILV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and SilverCrest Metals Inc (SILV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSM, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.93
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSM, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.56
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FSM, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSM, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.68
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FSM, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.55
SILV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SILV, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SILV, currently valued at 2.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SILV, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SILV, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SILV, currently valued at 7.05, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.05

FSM vs. SILV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the SILV Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSM and SILV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.93
1.66
FSM
SILV

Dividends

FSM vs. SILV - Dividend Comparison

Neither FSM nor SILV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FSM vs. SILV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSM drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, which is greater than SILV's maximum drawdown of -69.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSM and SILV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-52.41%
-22.83%
FSM
SILV

Volatility

FSM vs. SILV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) is 15.25%, while SilverCrest Metals Inc (SILV) has a volatility of 18.65%. This indicates that FSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%20.00%22.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.25%
18.65%
FSM
SILV

Financials

FSM vs. SILV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. and SilverCrest Metals Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items