PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSM vs. SILV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FSM vs. SILV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and SilverCrest Metals Inc (SILV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FSM

1D
-3.88%
1M
-3.33%
6M
-13.80%
YTD
-14.07%
1Y
31.92%
3Y*
35.35%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
-0.84%
ALL TIME*
8.20%

SILV

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$47.56M$43.76M$48.63M

FSM vs. SILV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.
-14.07%128.67%11.14%2.93%-3.85%-52.67%101.96%12.09%-30.27%-7.61%
SILV
SilverCrest Metals Inc
0.00%26.92%38.93%9.17%-24.15%-29.25%65.88%130.03%106.34%-19.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FSM and SILV is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2015

0.53

The correlation between FSM and SILV shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

FSM:

$1.10B

SILV:

$279.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FSM:

$598.05M

SILV:

$162.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

FSM:

$743.42M

SILV:

$167.82M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSM vs. SILV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSM
FSM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSM Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SILV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSM vs. SILV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and SilverCrest Metals Inc (SILV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSMSILVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.48

FSM vs. SILV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSM vs. SILV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSMSILVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.79%

Volatility

FSM vs. SILV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSMSILVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.24%

Dividends

FSM vs. SILV - Dividend Comparison

Neither FSM nor SILV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FSM vs. SILV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. and SilverCrest Metals Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FSM and SILV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSM and SILV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer