FSM vs. CHRD
FSM (Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.) and CHRD (Chord Energy Corp) are both stocks. FSM operates in Silver (Basic Materials), while CHRD operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, FSM returned 9.76%/yr vs 14.96%/yr for CHRD. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FSM vs. CHRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSM achieves a -7.75% return, which is significantly lower than CHRD's 36.85% return.
FSM
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- -7.75%
- 6M
- -11.01%
- 1Y
- 36.09%
- 3Y*
- 43.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 3.71%
CHRD
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -13.56%
- YTD
- 36.85%
- 6M
- 39.69%
- 1Y
- 25.22%
- 3Y*
- 0.20%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- —
FSM vs. CHRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSM Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. | -7.75% | 128.67% | 11.14% | 2.93% | -3.85% | -52.67% | 30.38% |
CHRD Chord Energy Corp | 36.85% | -16.37% | -24.26% | 31.74% | 34.13% | 260.89% | 36.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSM and CHRD is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2020 | 0.19 |
The correlation between FSM and CHRD shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FSM:
$3.01B
CHRD:
$7.07B
FSM:
$1.06
CHRD:
-$1.17
FSM:
2.65
CHRD:
1.33
FSM:
1.70
CHRD:
0.88
FSM:
$1.10B
CHRD:
$5.33B
FSM:
$598.05M
CHRD:
$488.13M
FSM:
$743.42M
CHRD:
$1.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSM vs. CHRD — Risk / Return Rank
FSM
CHRD
FSM vs. CHRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and Chord Energy Corp (CHRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSM | CHRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.13 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.03 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | 2.21 | -0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSM vs. CHRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSM drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, which is greater than CHRD's maximum drawdown of -53.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSM and CHRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSM | CHRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.25% | -53.91% | -38.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.78% | -24.58% | -16.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.78% | -53.91% | +13.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.27% | -53.91% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.75% | -25.76% | -7.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -16.58% | -28.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 11.46% | +5.05% |
Volatility
FSM vs. CHRD - Volatility Comparison
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) has a higher volatility of 17.19% compared to Chord Energy Corp (CHRD) at 12.38%. This indicates that FSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSM | CHRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.19% | 12.38% | +4.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.19% | 29.74% | +16.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.19% | 38.23% | +19.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.53% | 39.65% | +17.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.53% | 40.68% | +18.85% |
Dividends
FSM vs. CHRD - Dividend Comparison
FSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRD Chord Energy Corp | 4.18% | 5.61% | 10.13% | 7.15% | 19.76% | 4.46% |
FSM Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FSM vs. CHRD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. and Chord Energy Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FSM vs. CHRD - Profitability Comparison
FSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported a gross profit of 211.84M and revenue of 342.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.
CHRD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported an operating income of 182.18M and revenue of 342.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.2%.
CHRD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported an operating income of 333.22M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.
FSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported a net income of 111.01M and revenue of 342.47M, resulting in a net margin of 32.4%.
CHRD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chord Energy Corp reported a net income of 108.61M and revenue of 1.67B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FSM and CHRD have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSM has higher volatility (17.19%) compared to CHRD (12.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSM dropped -92.25% vs CHRD's -53.91%.
CHRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSM and CHRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer