FSLR vs. FNDF
FSLR (First Solar, Inc.) is a stock, while FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, FSLR returned 18.76%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for FNDF. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FSLR vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSLR achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLR has outperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 18.76%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.
FSLR
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 15.41%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 4.91%
- 1Y
- 52.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 27.42%
- 10Y*
- 18.76%
FNDF
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- 1Y
- 41.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
FSLR vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | 2.33% | 48.22% | 2.30% | 15.01% | 71.86% | -11.89% | 76.77% | 31.81% | -37.12% | 110.41% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 19.66% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 18.46% | -14.21% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSLR and FNDF is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.40 |
The correlation between FSLR and FNDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSLR vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank
FSLR
FNDF
FSLR vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSLR | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.45 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 3.82 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 14.27 | -10.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSLR vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSLR drawdown since its inception was -96.22%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLR and FNDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSLR | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.22% | -40.14% | -56.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.10% | -10.60% | -24.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.97% | -13.89% | -46.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.97% | -25.56% | -34.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.26% | -40.14% | -21.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.01% | -1.94% | -14.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.20% | -7.63% | -55.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.63% | 2.84% | +13.79% |
Volatility
FSLR vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) has a higher volatility of 23.37% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) at 6.65%. This indicates that FSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSLR | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.37% | 6.65% | +16.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.98% | 13.64% | +28.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.23% | 16.00% | +42.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.07% | 16.35% | +37.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.84% | 17.71% | +33.13% |
Dividends
FSLR vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
FSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 2.87% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSLR and FNDF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSLR has higher volatility (23.37%) compared to FNDF (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLR dropped -96.22% vs FNDF's -40.14%.
FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSLR and FNDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer