PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSLR vs. TAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSLR vs. TAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSLR vs. TAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
-24.49%48.22%2.30%15.01%71.86%-11.89%76.77%31.81%-37.12%110.41%
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
13.42%48.31%-37.61%-26.79%-5.24%-25.10%233.96%66.53%-25.67%54.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLR achieves a -24.49% return, which is significantly lower than TAN's 13.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLR has outperformed TAN with an annualized return of 11.32%, while TAN has yielded a comparatively lower 10.33% annualized return.


FSLR

1D
6.80%
1M
0.03%
YTD
-24.49%
6M
-10.55%
1Y
56.02%
3Y*
-3.20%
5Y*
18.02%
10Y*
11.32%

TAN

1D
5.33%
1M
1.29%
YTD
13.42%
6M
27.69%
1Y
82.90%
3Y*
-10.29%
5Y*
-9.18%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSLR vs. TAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLR
FSLR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

TAN
TAN Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLR vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSLRTANDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

2.11

-1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

2.69

-1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

4.90

-3.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.83

12.99

-9.15

FSLR vs. TAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the TAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLR and TAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSLRTANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.11

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

-0.23

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.27

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

-0.15

+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between FSLR and TAN is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FSLR vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither FSLR nor TAN has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.30%0.69%1.77%5.04%1.60%

Drawdowns

FSLR vs. TAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLR drawdown since its inception was -96.22%, roughly equal to the maximum TAN drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLR and TAN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSLRTANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.22%

-95.29%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.10%

-16.25%

-18.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.97%

-73.95%

+13.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.26%

-78.53%

+17.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.60%

-74.42%

+37.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.60%

-78.57%

+14.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.34%

6.13%

+8.21%

Volatility

FSLR vs. TAN - Volatility Comparison

First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) has a higher volatility of 11.39% compared to Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) at 10.63%. This indicates that FSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSLRTANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.39%

10.63%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.09%

26.24%

+12.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.72%

39.55%

+24.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.41%

39.82%

+13.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.36%

37.78%

+12.58%