FSI vs. INFU
FSI (Flexible Solutions International Inc.) and INFU (InfuSystem Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. FSI operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while INFU operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, FSI returned 14.32%/yr vs 12.13%/yr for INFU. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FSI vs. INFU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSI achieves a -25.06% return, which is significantly lower than INFU's 1.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FSI has outperformed INFU with an annualized return of 14.32%, while INFU has yielded a comparatively lower 12.13% annualized return.
FSI
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -19.36%
- 6M
- -12.65%
- YTD
- -25.06%
- 1Y
- -2.89%
- 3Y*
- 23.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.74%
INFU
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -10.04%
- 6M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 60.35%
- 3Y*
- -3.31%
- 5Y*
- -12.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $161.94K | $131.46K | $126.47K | |
| $1.28M | $1.25M | $2.11M |
FSI vs. INFU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSI Flexible Solutions International Inc. | -25.06% | 90.62% | 98.05% | -37.34% | -20.31% | 56.22% | -3.11% | 108.69% | -25.82% | 36.87% |
INFU InfuSystem Holdings Inc. | 1.90% | 6.15% | -19.83% | 21.43% | -49.03% | -9.32% | 120.16% | 147.97% | 49.57% | -9.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSI and INFU is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
FSI:
$64.25M
INFU:
$184.46M
FSI:
$0.14
INFU:
$0.38
FSI:
35.36
INFU:
24.31
FSI:
2.08
INFU:
0.02
FSI:
1.77
INFU:
1.35
FSI:
$38.56M
INFU:
$142.40M
FSI:
$12.53M
INFU:
$80.81M
FSI:
$6.56M
INFU:
$23.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSI vs. INFU — Risk / Return Rank
FSI
INFU
FSI vs. INFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flexible Solutions International Inc. (FSI) and InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSI | INFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.23 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 2.04 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 4.49 | -4.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSI vs. INFU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSI drawdown since its inception was -88.76%, which is greater than INFU's maximum drawdown of -79.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSI and INFU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSI | INFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.76% | -79.49% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.56% | -31.17% | -24.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.56% | -58.22% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.62% | -76.70% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.74% | -79.49% | +3.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.20% | -60.12% | +4.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.43% | -42.13% | -7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.37% | 14.11% | +25.26% |
Volatility
FSI vs. INFU - Volatility Comparison
Flexible Solutions International Inc. (FSI) has a higher volatility of 14.65% compared to InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU) at 12.53%. This indicates that FSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSI | INFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.65% | 12.53% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.85% | 37.83% | -3.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.23% | 55.14% | +6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.87% | 53.30% | +12.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.87% | 54.37% | +10.50% |
Dividends
FSI vs. INFU - Dividend Comparison
Neither FSI nor INFU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSI Flexible Solutions International Inc. | 0.00% | 1.49% | 2.77% | 2.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.78% |
INFU InfuSystem Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FSI vs. INFU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flexible Solutions International Inc. and InfuSystem Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FSI and INFU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSI has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to INFU (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSI dropped -88.76% vs INFU's -79.49%.
INFU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSI and INFU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer