FSI vs. INFU
FSI (Flexible Solutions International Inc.) and INFU (InfuSystem Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. FSI operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while INFU operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, FSI returned 18.10%/yr vs 13.15%/yr for INFU. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FSI vs. INFU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSI achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly lower than INFU's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FSI has outperformed INFU with an annualized return of 18.10%, while INFU has yielded a comparatively lower 13.15% annualized return.
FSI
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -9.86%
- 1Y
- 47.48%
- 3Y*
- 35.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 18.10%
INFU
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 46.93%
- 3Y*
- -2.78%
- 5Y*
- -12.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
FSI vs. INFU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSI Flexible Solutions International Inc. | -4.16% | 90.62% | 98.05% | -37.34% | -20.31% | 56.22% | -3.11% | 108.69% | -25.82% | 36.87% |
INFU InfuSystem Holdings Inc. | 1.23% | 6.15% | -19.83% | 21.43% | -49.03% | -9.32% | 120.16% | 147.97% | 49.57% | -9.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSI and INFU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
FSI:
$0.14
INFU:
$0.38
FSI:
44.79
INFU:
24.16
FSI:
2.64
INFU:
0.02
FSI:
2.24
INFU:
1.34
FSI:
$38.56M
INFU:
$142.40M
FSI:
$12.53M
INFU:
$80.81M
FSI:
$6.56M
INFU:
$23.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSI vs. INFU — Risk / Return Rank
FSI
INFU
FSI vs. INFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flexible Solutions International Inc. (FSI) and InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSI | INFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.51 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 3.40 | -2.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSI vs. INFU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSI drawdown since its inception was -88.76%, which is greater than INFU's maximum drawdown of -79.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSI and INFU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSI | INFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.76% | -79.49% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.51% | -31.17% | -22.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.72% | -58.22% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.62% | -78.13% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.74% | -79.49% | +3.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.71% | -60.38% | +17.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.44% | -42.03% | -7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.14% | 13.83% | +22.31% |
Volatility
FSI vs. INFU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Flexible Solutions International Inc. (FSI) is 7.30%, while InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that FSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSI | INFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 12.20% | -4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.67% | 36.39% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.56% | 53.93% | +11.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.80% | 53.58% | +12.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.17% | 54.55% | +10.62% |
Dividends
FSI vs. INFU - Dividend Comparison
Neither FSI nor INFU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSI Flexible Solutions International Inc. | 0.00% | 1.49% | 2.77% | 2.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.78% |
INFU InfuSystem Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FSI vs. INFU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flexible Solutions International Inc. and InfuSystem Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FSI and INFU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INFU has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to FSI (7.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSI dropped -88.76% vs INFU's -79.49%.
INFU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSI and INFU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer