INFU vs. QRHC
Compare and contrast key facts about InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU) and Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: INFU or QRHC.
Correlation
The correlation between INFU and QRHC is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
INFU vs. QRHC - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
INFU:
128.50%
QRHC:
31.79%
INFU:
-1.83%
QRHC:
-1.68%
INFU:
-1.83%
QRHC:
0.00%
Fundamentals
INFU:
$112.86M
QRHC:
$51.31M
INFU:
$0.11
QRHC:
-$0.73
INFU:
0.00
QRHC:
1.24
INFU:
0.82
QRHC:
0.18
INFU:
1.96
QRHC:
0.95
INFU:
$102.87M
QRHC:
$215.88M
INFU:
$53.38M
QRHC:
$33.59M
INFU:
$13.91M
QRHC:
$1.44M
Returns By Period
INFU
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
QRHC
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
INFU vs. QRHC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
INFU
QRHC
INFU vs. QRHC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU) and Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
INFU vs. QRHC - Dividend Comparison
Neither INFU nor QRHC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
INFU vs. QRHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFU drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, which is greater than QRHC's maximum drawdown of -1.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFU and QRHC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
INFU vs. QRHC - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...
Financials
INFU vs. QRHC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between InfuSystem Holdings Inc. and Quest Resource Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
INFU vs. QRHC - Profitability Comparison
INFU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 18.22M and revenue of 33.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.8%.
QRHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 10.73M and revenue of 69.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.3%.
INFU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 2.62M and revenue of 33.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.
QRHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported an operating income of -7.18M and revenue of 69.97M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.3%.
INFU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 933.00K and revenue of 33.85M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
QRHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quest Resource Holding Corporation reported a net income of -9.51M and revenue of 69.97M, resulting in a net margin of -13.6%.