INFU vs. NOAH
INFU (InfuSystem Holdings Inc.) and NOAH (Noah Holdings Limited) are both stocks. INFU operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while NOAH operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, INFU returned 11.84%/yr vs -5.10%/yr for NOAH. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INFU vs. NOAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INFU achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than NOAH's 5.68% return. Over the past 10 years, INFU has outperformed NOAH with an annualized return of 11.84%, while NOAH has yielded a comparatively lower -5.10% annualized return.
INFU
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -14.37%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- 56.34%
- 3Y*
- -0.89%
- 5Y*
- -13.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
NOAH
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- -2.29%
- 5Y*
- -19.27%
- 10Y*
- -5.10%
INFU vs. NOAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFU InfuSystem Holdings Inc. | -1.00% | 6.15% | -19.83% | 21.43% | -49.03% | -9.32% | 120.16% | 147.97% | 49.57% | -9.80% |
NOAH Noah Holdings Limited | 5.68% | -5.58% | 6.83% | -8.37% | -49.49% | -35.81% | 35.17% | -18.35% | -6.40% | 111.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFU and NOAH is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2010 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
INFU:
$185.54M
NOAH:
$148.16M
INFU:
$0.38
NOAH:
$38.08
INFU:
23.62
NOAH:
0.28
INFU:
1.31
NOAH:
0.06
INFU:
3.16
NOAH:
0.02
INFU:
$142.40M
NOAH:
$2.61B
INFU:
$80.81M
NOAH:
$2.07B
INFU:
$23.03M
NOAH:
$683.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFU vs. NOAH — Risk / Return Rank
INFU
NOAH
INFU vs. NOAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU) and Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INFU | NOAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.34 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 0.71 | +1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.09 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 0.57 | +1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.04 | 1.14 | +2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INFU | NOAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.34 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | -0.35 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | -0.10 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | -0.00 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
INFU vs. NOAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFU drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, smaller than the maximum NOAH drawdown of -86.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFU and NOAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFU | NOAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.49% | -86.16% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.17% | -23.43% | -7.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.22% | -44.80% | -13.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.13% | -81.13% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.49% | -86.16% | +6.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.26% | -77.61% | +16.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.98% | -48.89% | +6.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.28% | 11.70% | +1.58% |
Volatility
INFU vs. NOAH - Volatility Comparison
InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU) has a higher volatility of 19.55% compared to Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) at 7.60%. This indicates that INFU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFU | NOAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.55% | 7.60% | +11.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.71% | 24.51% | +11.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.69% | 34.25% | +19.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.41% | 55.23% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.46% | 50.60% | +3.86% |
Dividends
INFU vs. NOAH - Dividend Comparison
INFU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INFU InfuSystem Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOAH Noah Holdings Limited | 10.91% | 11.53% | 18.15% | 2.90% |
Financials
INFU vs. NOAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between InfuSystem Holdings Inc. and Noah Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
INFU vs. NOAH - Profitability Comparison
INFU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 19.68M and revenue of 33.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
NOAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noah Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 523.29M and revenue of 625.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.6%.
INFU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.59M and revenue of 33.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
NOAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noah Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 236.44M and revenue of 625.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.8%.
INFU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.02M and revenue of 33.68M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
NOAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noah Holdings Limited reported a net income of 124.72M and revenue of 625.75M, resulting in a net margin of 19.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
INFU and NOAH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INFU has higher volatility (19.55%) compared to NOAH (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFU dropped -79.49% vs NOAH's -86.16%.
INFU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INFU and NOAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer