INFU vs. MRVL
INFU (InfuSystem Holdings Inc.) and MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. INFU operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while MRVL operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, INFU returned 12.95%/yr vs 42.22%/yr for MRVL. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INFU vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INFU achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 262.72% return. Over the past 10 years, INFU has underperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 12.95%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively higher 42.22% annualized return.
INFU
- 1D
- -5.31%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -2.62%
- 1Y
- 42.72%
- 3Y*
- -3.35%
- 5Y*
- -14.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
MRVL
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 56.81%
- YTD
- 262.72%
- 6M
- 263.49%
- 1Y
- 319.93%
- 3Y*
- 75.20%
- 5Y*
- 41.91%
- 10Y*
- 42.22%
INFU vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFU InfuSystem Holdings Inc. | -0.56% | 6.15% | -19.83% | 21.43% | -49.03% | -9.32% | 120.16% | 147.97% | 49.57% | -9.80% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 262.72% | -22.82% | 83.79% | 63.68% | -57.48% | 84.62% | 80.25% | 65.74% | -23.62% | 56.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFU and MRVL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
INFU:
$186.37M
MRVL:
$275.01B
INFU:
$0.38
MRVL:
$2.90
INFU:
23.73
MRVL:
106.30
INFU:
0.02
MRVL:
0.19
INFU:
1.32
MRVL:
30.81
INFU:
3.17
MRVL:
15.10
INFU:
$142.40M
MRVL:
$8.72B
INFU:
$80.81M
MRVL:
$4.41B
INFU:
$23.03M
MRVL:
$4.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFU vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank
INFU
MRVL
INFU vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INFU | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.56 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 12.23 | -10.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 27.84 | -24.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INFU vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFU drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFU and MRVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFU | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.49% | -91.60% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.17% | -26.36% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.22% | -60.79% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.13% | -61.88% | -16.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.49% | -61.88% | -17.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.08% | -2.71% | -58.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.03% | -46.71% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.79% | 11.56% | +2.23% |
Volatility
INFU vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU) is 12.09%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 42.61%. This indicates that INFU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFU | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.09% | 42.61% | -30.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.41% | 56.98% | -20.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.01% | 72.31% | -18.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.58% | 62.28% | -8.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.55% | 52.20% | +2.35% |
Dividends
INFU vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison
INFU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFU InfuSystem Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 0.08% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
Financials
INFU vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between InfuSystem Holdings Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
INFU vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison
INFU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 19.68M and revenue of 33.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
INFU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.59M and revenue of 33.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
INFU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.02M and revenue of 33.68M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
INFU and MRVL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRVL has higher volatility (42.61%) compared to INFU (12.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFU dropped -79.49% vs MRVL's -91.60%.
MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.47 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INFU and MRVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer