PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSI vs. CTVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FSI vs. CTVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flexible Solutions International Inc. (FSI) and Corteva, Inc. (CTVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSI achieves a -3.49% return, which is significantly lower than CTVA's 18.19% return.


FSI

1D
0.15%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
-3.49%
6M
-8.85%
1Y
45.52%
3Y*
35.94%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
18.18%

CTVA

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
18.19%
6M
18.08%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
12.51%
5Y*
13.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSI vs. CTVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSI
Flexible Solutions International Inc.
-3.49%90.62%98.05%-37.34%-20.31%56.22%-3.11%-14.13%
CTVA
Corteva, Inc.
18.19%18.89%20.24%-17.51%25.58%23.55%33.49%0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FSI and CTVA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019

0.21

The correlation between FSI and CTVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

FSI:

$0.14

CTVA:

$1.72

PE Ratio

FSI:

45.11

CTVA:

45.95

PS Ratio

FSI:

2.25

CTVA:

2.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

FSI:

$38.56M

CTVA:

$17.89B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FSI:

$12.53M

CTVA:

$6.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

FSI:

$6.56M

CTVA:

$2.68B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSI vs. CTVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSI
FSI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

CTVA
CTVA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CTVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTVA Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CTVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSI vs. CTVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flexible Solutions International Inc. (FSI) and Corteva, Inc. (CTVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSICTVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.08

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.39

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.27

0.83

+0.44

FSI vs. CTVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the CTVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSI and CTVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSI vs. CTVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSI drawdown since its inception was -88.76%, which is greater than CTVA's maximum drawdown of -34.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSI and CTVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSICTVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.76%

-34.76%

-54.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.51%

-20.71%

-32.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.72%

-24.69%

-29.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.62%

-34.76%

-33.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.31%

-7.51%

-34.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.44%

-10.53%

-38.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.04%

9.70%

+26.34%

Volatility

FSI vs. CTVA - Volatility Comparison

Flexible Solutions International Inc. (FSI) has a higher volatility of 7.67% compared to Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) at 5.13%. This indicates that FSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSICTVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.67%

5.13%

+2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.72%

15.45%

+17.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.68%

23.30%

+42.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.81%

26.91%

+38.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.18%

32.62%

+32.56%

Dividends

FSI vs. CTVA - Dividend Comparison

FSI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CTVA
Corteva, Inc.
0.91%1.04%1.16%1.29%0.99%1.14%1.34%0.88%
FSI
Flexible Solutions International Inc.
0.00%1.49%2.77%2.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.78%

Financials

FSI vs. CTVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flexible Solutions International Inc. and Corteva, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
10.56M
4.91B
(FSI) Total Revenue
(CTVA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FSI and CTVA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSI has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to CTVA (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSI dropped -88.76% vs CTVA's -34.76%.

FSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSI and CTVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer