FSI vs. CTVA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Flexible Solutions International Inc. (FSI) and Corteva, Inc. (CTVA).

Performance

FSI vs. CTVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Flexible Solutions International Inc. (FSI) and Corteva, Inc. (CTVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FSI vs. CTVA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FSI Flexible Solutions International Inc.	-19.70%	90.62%	98.05%	-37.34%	-20.31%	56.22%	-3.11%	-18.36%
CTVA Corteva, Inc.	25.17%	18.89%	20.24%	-17.51%	25.58%	23.55%	33.49%	2.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FSI : $73.04M CTVA : $56.48B
EPS FSI : $0.35 CTVA : $1.61
PE Ratio FSI : 15.40 CTVA : 51.94
PS Ratio FSI : 1.88 CTVA : 3.27
PB Ratio FSI : 1.87 CTVA : 2.34
Total Revenue (TTM) FSI : $38.56M CTVA : $17.40B
Gross Profit (TTM) FSI : $12.53M CTVA : $6.57B
EBITDA (TTM) FSI : $9.95M CTVA : $2.71B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSI achieves a -19.70% return, which is significantly lower than CTVA's 25.17% return.

FSI

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: -19.70%
• 6M: -43.98%
• 1Y: 9.43%
• 3Y*: 23.58%
• 5Y*: 8.10%
• 10Y*: 21.38%

CTVA

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 4.72%
• YTD: 25.17%
• 6M: 24.39%
• 1Y: 34.32%
• 3Y*: 12.80%
• 5Y*: 13.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FSI vs. CTVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSI

FSI Risk / Return Rank: 48
FSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FSI Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FSI Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CTVA

CTVA Risk / Return Rank: 77
CTVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CTVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CTVA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CTVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CTVA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSI vs. CTVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flexible Solutions International Inc. (FSI) and Corteva, Inc. (CTVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSI	CTVA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	1.34	-1.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	1.73	-0.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.27	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	1.86	-1.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.39	4.10	-3.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSI vs. CTVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the CTVA Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSI and CTVA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSI	CTVA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14	1.34	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.51	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.56	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between FSI and CTVA is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FSI vs. CTVA - Dividend Comparison

FSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than CTVA's 0.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FSI Flexible Solutions International Inc.	1.85%	1.49%	2.77%	2.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	7.78%
CTVA Corteva, Inc.	0.85%	1.04%	1.16%	1.29%	0.99%	1.14%	1.34%	0.88%

Drawdowns

FSI vs. CTVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSI drawdown since its inception was -88.76%, which is greater than CTVA's maximum drawdown of -34.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSI and CTVA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSI	CTVA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.76%	-34.76%	-54.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.42%	-20.71%	-32.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.62%	-34.76%	-33.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.00%	0.00%	-52.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.49%	-10.65%	-38.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.54%	9.38%	+21.16%

Volatility

FSI vs. CTVA - Volatility Comparison

Flexible Solutions International Inc. (FSI) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) at 7.61%. This indicates that FSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSI	CTVA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.08%	7.61%	+3.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.07%	18.22%	+14.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.13%	25.93%	+41.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.55%	26.97%	+38.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.78%	32.92%	+32.86%

Financials

FSI vs. CTVA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Flexible Solutions International Inc. and Corteva, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Flexible Solutions International Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.52M and revenue of 10.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

CTVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Flexible Solutions International Inc. reported an operating income of 3.54M and revenue of 10.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.5%.

CTVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.15B and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in an operating margin of -29.3%.

FSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Flexible Solutions International Inc. reported a net income of 2.27M and revenue of 10.56M, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.

CTVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Corteva, Inc. reported a net income of -552.00M and revenue of 3.91B, resulting in a net margin of -14.1%.