FSHOX vs. FSCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX).
FSHOX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 28, 1986. FSCPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 28, 1990.
Performance
FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHOX Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio | -3.21% | 5.24% | 15.28% | 30.85% | -22.76% | 57.51% | 25.95% | 41.15% | -15.87% | 26.25% |
FSCPX Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio | -11.31% | 7.88% | 24.56% | 41.81% | -34.88% | 19.23% | 35.68% | 27.06% | -1.03% | 21.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSHOX achieves a -3.21% return, which is significantly higher than FSCPX's -11.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FSHOX has outperformed FSCPX with an annualized return of 13.80%, while FSCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.93% annualized return.
FSHOX
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -13.82%
- YTD
- -3.21%
- 6M
- -7.81%
- 1Y
- 8.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
FSCPX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- -11.31%
- 6M
- -9.98%
- 1Y
- 11.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FSHOX and FSCPX have an expense ratio of 0.76%.
Return for Risk
FSHOX vs. FSCPX — Risk / Return Rank
FSHOX
FSCPX
FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSHOX | FSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | 0.45 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 0.85 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.11 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 0.47 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 1.63 | -0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSHOX | FSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 0.45 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.18 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.49 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.53 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSHOX and FSCPX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Dividend Comparison
FSHOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than FSCPX's 6.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHOX Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio | 4.04% | 3.91% | 4.05% | 0.82% | 0.80% | 5.45% | 4.73% | 7.91% | 15.47% | 13.62% | 3.61% | 3.26% |
FSCPX Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio | 6.52% | 5.78% | 7.41% | 2.17% | 13.79% | 9.08% | 1.16% | 2.22% | 3.32% | 3.72% | 0.90% | 3.81% |
Drawdowns
FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSHOX drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, which is greater than FSCPX's maximum drawdown of -57.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHOX and FSCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSHOX | FSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.68% | -57.76% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.54% | -15.99% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.23% | -39.23% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.67% | -39.23% | -4.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.54% | -15.99% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.85% | -8.56% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.31% | 4.62% | +0.69% |
Volatility
FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) at 6.45%. This indicates that FSHOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSHOX | FSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 6.45% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 13.51% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.59% | 24.70% | -3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 24.67% | -3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 22.59% | -0.29% |