PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSHOX vs. FSCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSHOX achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly higher than FSCPX's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FSHOX has outperformed FSCPX with an annualized return of 14.43%, while FSCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.37% annualized return.


FSHOX

1D
-1.31%
1M
-4.54%
YTD
3.65%
6M
1.87%
1Y
11.10%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
14.43%

FSCPX

1D
-2.31%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.47%
1Y
14.91%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSHOX
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio
3.65%5.24%15.28%30.85%-22.76%57.51%25.95%41.15%-15.87%26.25%
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
0.50%7.88%24.56%41.81%-34.88%19.23%35.68%27.06%-1.03%21.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FSHOX and FSCPX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1990

0.77

The correlation between FSHOX and FSCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSHOX vs. FSCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSHOX
FSHOX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FSHOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSHOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSHOX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FSHOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSHOX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

FSCPX
FSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSHOXFSCPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

0.78

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.96

1.23

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.14

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

0.88

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.65

2.80

-1.14

FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSHOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the FSCPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSHOX and FSCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSHOXFSCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

0.78

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.26

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.55

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.54

+0.02

Drawdowns

FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSHOX drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, which is greater than FSCPX's maximum drawdown of -57.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHOX and FSCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSHOXFSCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.68%

-57.76%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.54%

-15.99%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-27.71%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.23%

-39.23%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.67%

-39.23%

-4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.63%

-4.81%

-5.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-8.55%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.29%

5.01%

+1.28%

Volatility

FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) have volatilities of 6.06% and 5.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSHOXFSCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

5.99%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.68%

13.68%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.87%

18.97%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.69%

24.79%

-3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.49%

22.72%

-0.23%

FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSHOX and FSCPX have an expense ratio of 0.76%.


Dividends

FSHOX vs. FSCPX - Dividend Comparison

FSHOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, less than FSCPX's 9.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
9.14%5.78%7.41%2.17%13.79%9.08%1.16%2.22%3.32%3.72%0.90%3.81%
FSHOX
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio
6.21%3.91%4.05%0.82%0.80%5.45%4.73%7.91%15.47%13.62%3.61%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSHOX and FSCPX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSHOX has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to FSCPX (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHOX dropped -61.68% vs FSCPX's -57.76%.

FSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSHOX and FSCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer