PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCPX vs. FDLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCPX vs. FDLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCPX achieves a -3.76% return, which is significantly lower than FDLSX's 0.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSCPX having a 11.42% annualized return and FDLSX not far behind at 11.25%.


FSCPX

1D
0.51%
1M
-4.32%
6M
-5.42%
YTD
-3.76%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
11.22%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
11.42%
ALL TIME*
10.44%

FDLSX

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.01%
6M
2.96%
YTD
0.65%
1Y
-13.90%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
11.25%
ALL TIME*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSCPX vs. FDLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
-3.76%7.88%24.56%41.81%-34.88%19.23%35.68%27.06%-1.03%21.70%
FDLSX
Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio
0.65%-5.30%20.17%30.14%-15.27%21.66%18.59%28.78%-7.65%29.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCPX and FDLSX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 1990

0.84

The correlation between FSCPX and FDLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCPX vs. FDLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSCPX
FSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FDLSX
FDLSX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FDLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSCPX vs. FDLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSCPXFDLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.88

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

-0.59

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

-0.96

+1.59

FSCPX vs. FDLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the FDLSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCPX and FDLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSCPX vs. FDLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCPX drawdown since its inception was -57.76%, which is greater than FDLSX's maximum drawdown of -51.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCPX and FDLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCPXFDLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.76%

-51.58%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.99%

-27.94%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.71%

-28.33%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.23%

-28.33%

-10.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.23%

-48.44%

+9.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

-17.51%

+8.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-8.98%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

17.32%

-11.69%

Volatility

FSCPX vs. FDLSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) at 5.69%. This indicates that FSCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCPXFDLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

5.69%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

15.67%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.93%

22.12%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.98%

21.61%

+3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.81%

22.38%

+0.43%

FSCPX vs. FDLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCPX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FDLSX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCPX vs. FDLSX - Dividend Comparison

FSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.55%, more than FDLSX's 5.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDLSX
Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio
5.13%9.12%7.41%1.64%3.32%22.77%2.36%6.43%19.76%6.33%1.01%5.42%
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
9.55%5.78%7.41%2.17%13.79%9.08%1.16%2.22%3.32%3.72%0.90%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCPX and FDLSX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSCPX has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to FDLSX (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCPX dropped -57.76% vs FDLSX's -51.58%.

FSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCPX and FDLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer