FSCPX vs. ONEQ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FSCPX (Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio) and ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) are both funds - FSCPX is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Over the past 10 years, FSCPX returned 12.37%/yr vs 19.78%/yr for ONEQ. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSCPX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ONEQ.

Performance

FSCPX vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCPX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 17.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCPX has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 12.37%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.78% annualized return.

FSCPX

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 1.47%
• 1Y: 14.91%
• 3Y*: 17.02%
• 5Y*: 6.49%
• 10Y*: 12.37%

ONEQ

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: 17.15%
• 6M: 16.35%
• 1Y: 41.97%
• 3Y*: 28.05%
• 5Y*: 15.92%
• 10Y*: 19.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCPX vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSCPX Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio	0.50%	7.88%	24.56%	41.81%	-34.88%	19.23%	35.68%	27.06%	-1.03%	21.70%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	17.15%	20.89%	29.30%	45.73%	-32.12%	22.11%	44.87%	38.01%	-3.18%	29.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCPX and ONEQ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2003	0.85

The correlation between FSCPX and ONEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSCPX vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCPX

FSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 9
FSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 74
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCPX vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSCPX	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	2.63	-1.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	3.42	-2.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.45	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	3.41	-2.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.80	13.50	-10.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSCPX vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCPX and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSCPX	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	2.63	-1.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.72	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.91	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.65	-0.11

Drawdowns

FSCPX vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCPX drawdown since its inception was -57.76%, roughly equal to the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCPX and ONEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSCPX	ONEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.76%	-55.09%	-2.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.99%	-12.64%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.71%	-24.09%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.23%	-35.23%	-4.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.23%	-35.23%	-4.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.81%	0.00%	-4.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.55%	-7.96%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	3.19%	+1.82%

Volatility

FSCPX vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) at 4.05%. This indicates that FSCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSCPX	ONEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.99%	4.05%	+1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.68%	11.93%	+1.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.97%	16.03%	+2.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.79%	22.14%	+2.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.72%	21.71%	+1.01%

FSCPX vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCPX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSCPX vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

FSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than ONEQ's 0.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSCPX Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio	9.14%	5.78%	7.41%	2.17%	13.79%	9.08%	1.16%	2.22%	3.32%	3.72%	0.90%	3.81%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	0.66%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSCPX and ONEQ in my portfolio?

FSCPX and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSCPX or ONEQ?

FSCPX has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to ONEQ (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCPX dropped -57.76% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.