PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCPX vs. VGHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCPX vs. VGHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares (VGHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCPX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than VGHCX's -3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCPX has outperformed VGHCX with an annualized return of 12.37%, while VGHCX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.


FSCPX

1D
-2.31%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.47%
1Y
14.91%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
12.37%

VGHCX

1D
-1.54%
1M
0.29%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-2.16%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCPX vs. VGHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
0.50%7.88%24.56%41.81%-34.88%19.23%35.68%27.06%-1.03%21.70%
VGHCX
Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares
-3.17%19.63%8.99%5.46%-1.05%14.36%12.57%22.93%1.03%19.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCPX and VGHCX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1990

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between FSCPX and VGHCX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCPX vs. VGHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCPX
FSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VGHCX
VGHCX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VGHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VGHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCPX vs. VGHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) and Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares (VGHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSCPXVGHCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

1.26

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

1.94

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.22

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.11

-1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.80

5.69

-2.90

FSCPX vs. VGHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the VGHCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCPX and VGHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSCPXVGHCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.26

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.42

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.51

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.93

-0.38

Drawdowns

FSCPX vs. VGHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCPX drawdown since its inception was -57.76%, which is greater than VGHCX's maximum drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCPX and VGHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCPXVGHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.76%

-36.93%

-20.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.99%

-9.20%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.71%

-16.08%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.23%

-16.95%

-22.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.23%

-27.18%

-12.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-6.15%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.55%

-5.25%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

3.41%

+1.60%

Volatility

FSCPX vs. VGHCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (FSCPX) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares (VGHCX) at 3.47%. This indicates that FSCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCPXVGHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

3.47%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.68%

10.25%

+3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.97%

14.68%

+4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.79%

18.19%

+6.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.72%

17.63%

+5.09%

FSCPX vs. VGHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCPX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than VGHCX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCPX vs. VGHCX - Dividend Comparison

FSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than VGHCX's 6.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCPX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discretionary Portfolio
9.14%5.78%7.41%2.17%13.79%9.08%1.16%2.22%3.32%3.72%0.90%3.81%
VGHCX
Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares
6.82%6.00%22.72%7.17%5.44%8.31%7.96%11.82%9.10%7.30%8.54%8.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCPX and VGHCX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSCPX has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to VGHCX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCPX dropped -57.76% vs VGHCX's -36.93%.

VGHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCPX and VGHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer