FSG.L vs. CL
FSG.L (Foresight Group Holdings Limited) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. FSG.L operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while CL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, FSG.L returned 3.60%/yr vs 3.73%/yr for CL. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
FSG.L vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FSG.L is traded in GBp, while CL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSG.L achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than CL's 9.14% return.
FSG.L
- 1D
- -2.04%
- 1M
- 7.06%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- —
CL
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- 1Y
- -3.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
FSG.L vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSG.L Foresight Group Holdings Limited | 2.34% | 10.74% | -0.12% | 3.49% | 2.33% | -3.93% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 9.14% | -17.32% | 18.60% | -1.40% | 5.80% | 11.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSG.L and CL is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | -0.04 |
Fundamentals
FSG.L:
£503.23M
CL:
$68.33B
FSG.L:
£0.60
CL:
$2.58
FSG.L:
7.23
CL:
32.90
FSG.L:
0.32
CL:
8.50
FSG.L:
1.63
CL:
3.30
FSG.L:
5.72
CL:
471.23
FSG.L:
£309.00M
CL:
$20.80B
FSG.L:
£284.24M
CL:
$12.49B
FSG.L:
£99.10M
CL:
$3.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSG.L vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
FSG.L
CL
FSG.L vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Foresight Group Holdings Limited (FSG.L) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSG.L | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.99 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | -0.19 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | -0.32 | +1.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSG.L | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | -0.16 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.20 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.49 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
FSG.L vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.89%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -29.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSG.L and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSG.L | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.89% | -29.32% | -11.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.42% | -17.07% | -11.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.89% | -29.32% | -11.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.89% | -29.32% | -11.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.12% | -20.36% | +8.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.84% | -7.77% | -5.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.85% | 10.27% | +1.58% |
Volatility
FSG.L vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
Foresight Group Holdings Limited (FSG.L) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) have volatilities of 6.57% and 6.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSG.L | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 6.28% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.73% | 17.23% | +4.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.98% | 21.45% | +5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.65% | 19.17% | +18.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.48% | 20.82% | +16.66% |
Dividends
FSG.L vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
FSG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than CL's 2.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.46% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
FSG.L Foresight Group Holdings Limited | 5.76% | 5.63% | 5.40% | 4.66% | 3.17% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FSG.L vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Foresight Group Holdings Limited and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FSG.L vs. CL - Profitability Comparison
FSG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Foresight Group Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 68.31M and revenue of 81.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.8%.
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
FSG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Foresight Group Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 22.48M and revenue of 81.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
FSG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Foresight Group Holdings Limited reported a net income of 18.39M and revenue of 81.53M, resulting in a net margin of 22.6%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FSG.L and CL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FSG.L and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer