PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEU.L vs. EIMI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSEU.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS (FSEU.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FSEU.L is traded in GBp, while EIMI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EIMI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEU.L achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 24.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSEU.L having a 10.82% annualized return and EIMI.L not far ahead at 11.09%.


FSEU.L

1D
0.52%
1M
1.83%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.30%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
10.82%

EIMI.L

1D
-1.30%
1M
5.47%
YTD
24.75%
6M
26.33%
1Y
50.86%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSEU.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS
9.29%27.11%9.24%16.69%-10.53%18.42%5.03%18.30%-10.14%16.67%
EIMI.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF
24.75%22.75%9.23%5.48%-10.12%0.29%15.31%11.94%-9.08%25.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FSEU.L and EIMI.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2015

0.62

The correlation between FSEU.L and EIMI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FSEU.L vs. EIMI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSEU.L
EIMI.L

Financial Services

28.0%
18.4%

Industrials

17.7%
8.9%

Healthcare

11.5%
3.7%

Technology

8.4%
35.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
9.6%

Energy

5.8%
3.9%

Communication Services

5.4%
6.4%

Utilities

5.4%
2.2%

Basic Materials

2.1%
6.9%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.7%

Financial Services

FSEU.L
28.0%
EIMI.L
18.4%

Industrials

FSEU.L
17.7%
EIMI.L
8.9%

Healthcare

FSEU.L
11.5%
EIMI.L
3.7%

Technology

FSEU.L
8.4%
EIMI.L
35.0%

Consumer Defensive

FSEU.L
8.2%
EIMI.L
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FSEU.L
6.2%
EIMI.L
9.6%

Energy

FSEU.L
5.8%
EIMI.L
3.9%

Communication Services

FSEU.L
5.4%
EIMI.L
6.4%

Utilities

FSEU.L
5.4%
EIMI.L
2.2%

Basic Materials

FSEU.L
2.1%
EIMI.L
6.9%

Real Estate

FSEU.L
1.3%
EIMI.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSEU.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEU.L
FSEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FSEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

EIMI.L
EIMI.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIMI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEU.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS (FSEU.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSEU.LEIMI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.53

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

4.78

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.05

16.25

-6.20

FSEU.L vs. EIMI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the EIMI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEU.L and EIMI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSEU.LEIMI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.83

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.53

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.60

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.47

+0.27

Drawdowns

FSEU.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEU.L drawdown since its inception was -29.40%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEU.L and EIMI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSEU.LEIMI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.40%

-31.70%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-10.58%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.08%

-15.79%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.33%

-22.27%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.40%

-26.10%

-3.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-2.29%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-8.72%

+4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

3.12%

-0.81%

Volatility

FSEU.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS (FSEU.L) is 3.39%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that FSEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSEU.LEIMI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

7.58%

-4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

15.58%

-6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

17.91%

-6.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

16.61%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.65%

18.39%

-3.74%

FSEU.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSEU.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FSEU.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FSEU.L and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EIMI.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EIMI.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FSEU.L.

FSEU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. FSEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSEU.L and 0.18% for EIMI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSEU.L and EIMI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer