PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEU.L vs. BIAHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSEU.L vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS (FSEU.L) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FSEU.L is traded in GBp, while BIAHX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BIAHX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEU.L achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than BIAHX's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FSEU.L has underperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 10.82%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.41% annualized return.


FSEU.L

1D
0.52%
1M
1.83%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.30%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
10.82%

BIAHX

1D
-0.87%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
0.01%
6M
1.14%
1Y
11.17%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
12.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSEU.L vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS
9.29%27.11%9.24%16.69%-10.53%18.42%5.03%18.30%-10.14%16.67%
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
0.01%36.77%12.78%13.39%-1.48%15.63%8.07%24.51%-11.66%20.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FSEU.L and BIAHX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2015

0.74

The correlation between FSEU.L and BIAHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSEU.L vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEU.L
FSEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FSEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BIAHX
BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEU.L vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS (FSEU.L) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSEU.LBIAHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.18

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

0.99

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.05

3.28

+6.77

FSEU.L vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the BIAHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEU.L and BIAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSEU.LBIAHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

0.98

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

1.01

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.83

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.76

-0.02

Drawdowns

FSEU.L vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEU.L drawdown since its inception was -29.40%, which is greater than BIAHX's maximum drawdown of -27.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEU.L and BIAHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSEU.LBIAHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.40%

-27.23%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-11.19%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.08%

-11.19%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.33%

-15.53%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.40%

-27.23%

-2.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-6.48%

+6.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-3.67%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

3.37%

-1.06%

Volatility

FSEU.L vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS (FSEU.L) is 3.39%, while Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that FSEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSEU.LBIAHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.98%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

9.44%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

11.36%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

12.91%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.65%

14.95%

-0.30%

FSEU.L vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSEU.L vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

FSEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
7.63%7.60%5.16%1.13%2.66%9.72%6.39%9.78%12.12%0.83%1.19%
FSEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSEU.L and BIAHX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSEU.L and BIAHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer