PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEU.L vs. CNDX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSEU.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS (FSEU.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSEU.L vs. CNDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS
4.35%27.11%9.24%16.69%-10.53%18.42%5.03%18.30%-10.14%16.67%
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
-3.56%11.22%28.66%48.50%-25.54%29.17%43.97%32.82%4.84%20.91%
Different Trading Currencies

FSEU.L is traded in GBp, while CNDX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNDX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEU.L achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly higher than CNDX.L's -3.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FSEU.L has underperformed CNDX.L with an annualized return of 10.50%, while CNDX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 19.75% annualized return.


FSEU.L

1D
2.45%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
4.35%
6M
10.75%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
10.50%

CNDX.L

1D
3.08%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
-3.56%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
21.51%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
14.03%
10Y*
19.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSEU.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FSEU.L vs. CNDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEU.L
FSEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FSEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CNDX.L
CNDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEU.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS (FSEU.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSEU.LCNDX.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

1.09

+0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

1.62

+0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.89

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.07

8.44

+1.64

FSEU.L vs. CNDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the CNDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEU.L and CNDX.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSEU.LCNDX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.09

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.70

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.98

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.09

-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between FSEU.L and CNDX.L is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FSEU.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FSEU.L nor CNDX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CNDX.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.05%0.06%0.03%0.04%0.07%0.06%0.30%0.16%0.16%

Drawdowns

FSEU.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEU.L drawdown since its inception was -29.40%, which is greater than CNDX.L's maximum drawdown of -27.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEU.L and CNDX.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSEU.LCNDX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.40%

-35.17%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-12.06%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.33%

-35.17%

+14.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.40%

-35.17%

+5.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-7.55%

+3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-5.35%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

2.95%

-0.58%

Volatility

FSEU.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Multifactor UCITS (FSEU.L) is 5.48%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that FSEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSEU.LCNDX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

5.99%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

12.14%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.49%

19.48%

-5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.61%

20.11%

-6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

20.19%

-5.58%