FSDPX vs. FSAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX).
FSDPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 28, 1986. FSAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985.
Performance
FSDPX vs. FSAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSDPX vs. FSAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio | 9.58% | 11.32% | -2.95% | 7.29% | -9.86% | 31.66% | 21.78% | 12.40% | -23.74% | 25.99% |
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 1.81% | 143.05% | 14.97% | -0.37% | -13.46% | -10.44% | 26.83% | 35.50% | -13.00% | 8.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSDPX achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly higher than FSAGX's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FSDPX has underperformed FSAGX with an annualized return of 8.22%, while FSAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.04% annualized return.
FSDPX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 20.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
FSAGX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -25.44%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 84.71%
- 3Y*
- 36.44%
- 5Y*
- 20.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSDPX vs. FSAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSDPX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FSAGX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSDPX vs. FSAGX — Risk / Return Rank
FSDPX
FSAGX
FSDPX vs. FSAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) and Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSDPX | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 2.02 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 2.29 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 2.84 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | 10.66 | -5.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSDPX | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 2.02 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.62 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.43 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.22 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSDPX and FSAGX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FSDPX vs. FSAGX - Dividend Comparison
FSDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than FSAGX's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio | 1.77% | 1.94% | 12.46% | 5.46% | 3.34% | 0.71% | 0.68% | 1.22% | 12.89% | 5.08% | 1.05% | 2.42% |
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 2.13% | 2.17% | 3.62% | 0.99% | 0.36% | 1.60% | 4.40% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 3.57% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FSDPX vs. FSAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSDPX drawdown since its inception was -64.19%, smaller than the maximum FSAGX drawdown of -77.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSDPX and FSAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSDPX | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.19% | -77.21% | +13.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -29.85% | +16.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.39% | -45.94% | +20.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.89% | -50.57% | +0.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | -25.44% | +17.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -33.41% | +22.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 7.95% | -3.95% |
Volatility
FSDPX vs. FSAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) is 6.64%, while Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a volatility of 15.39%. This indicates that FSDPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSDPX | FSAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 15.39% | -8.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 35.05% | -21.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.54% | 42.73% | -22.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.29% | 32.76% | -12.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 33.05% | -11.41% |