FSDPX vs. XLB
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB).
FSDPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 28, 1986. XLB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Materials Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Performance
FSDPX vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSDPX vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio | 9.58% | 11.32% | -2.95% | 7.29% | -9.86% | 31.66% | 21.78% | 12.40% | -23.74% | 25.99% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 10.68% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 24.13% | -14.88% | 24.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSDPX achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 10.68% return. Over the past 10 years, FSDPX has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 8.22%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.
FSDPX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 20.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
XLB
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- 10.68%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- 1Y
- 18.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.53%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSDPX vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSDPX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSDPX vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank
FSDPX
XLB
FSDPX vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSDPX | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 0.89 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.38 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | 4.72 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSDPX | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.89 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.36 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.51 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.36 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSDPX and XLB is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSDPX vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
FSDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than XLB's 1.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio | 1.77% | 1.94% | 12.46% | 5.46% | 3.34% | 0.71% | 0.68% | 1.22% | 12.89% | 5.08% | 1.05% | 2.42% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.75% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Drawdowns
FSDPX vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSDPX drawdown since its inception was -64.19%, which is greater than XLB's maximum drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSDPX and XLB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSDPX | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.19% | -59.83% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -14.64% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.39% | -24.72% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.89% | -37.27% | -12.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | -6.39% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -10.88% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 4.20% | -0.20% |
Volatility
FSDPX vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 6.28%. This indicates that FSDPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSDPX | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 6.28% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 12.53% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.54% | 20.95% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.29% | 18.91% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 20.62% | +1.02% |