FSAGX vs. FNCMX

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

FSAGX (Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio) and FNCMX (Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FSAGX is a Gold fund managed by Fidelity, while FNCMX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX returned 8.27%/yr vs 17.71%/yr for FNCMX. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FSAGX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FNCMX.

Performance

FSAGX vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a -10.86% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 8.27%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.71% annualized return.

FSAGX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -2.29%
• 6M: -28.59%
• YTD: -10.86%
• 1Y: 40.81%
• 3Y*: 34.45%
• 5Y*: 14.45%
• 10Y*: 8.27%
• ALL TIME*: 6.46%

FNCMX

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: -6.77%
• 6M: 3.51%
• YTD: 5.49%
• 1Y: 16.35%
• 3Y*: 20.43%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: 17.71%
• ALL TIME*: 11.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FSAGX vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	-10.86%	143.05%	14.97%	-0.37%	-13.46%	-10.44%	26.83%	35.50%	-13.00%	8.63%
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	5.49%	21.11%	29.48%	45.13%	-32.40%	22.21%	44.57%	36.63%	-3.07%	28.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAGX and FNCMX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2003	0.24

The correlation between FSAGX and FNCMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (10 years) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSAGX vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSAGX

FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FNCMX

FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 25
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSAGX vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSAGX	FNCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	0.91	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	1.33	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.16	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	1.28	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.17	4.31	-2.13

FSAGX vs. FNCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAGX and FNCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSAGX vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, which is greater than FNCMX's maximum drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and FNCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSAGX	FNCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.21%	-55.08%	-22.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.90%	-13.01%	-24.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.90%	-24.20%	-13.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.94%	-35.64%	-10.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.57%	-35.64%	-14.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.72%	-9.70%	-25.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.34%	-7.84%	-25.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.01%	3.85%	+13.16%

Volatility

FSAGX vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a higher volatility of 11.61% compared to Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) at 5.07%. This indicates that FSAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSAGX	FNCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.61%	5.07%	+6.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.36%	14.45%	+23.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.07%	18.23%	+27.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.48%	22.76%	+11.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.39%	22.14%	+11.25%

FSAGX vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSAGX vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than FNCMX's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund	0.49%	0.51%	0.61%	0.67%	0.88%	0.47%	0.67%	4.41%	1.93%	0.03%	1.01%	1.50%
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	5.76%	2.17%	3.62%	0.99%	0.36%	1.60%	4.40%	0.40%	0.00%	0.22%	3.57%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSAGX and FNCMX in my portfolio?

FSAGX and FNCMX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSAGX or FNCMX?

FSAGX has higher volatility (11.61%) compared to FNCMX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAGX dropped -77.21% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.