FSAGX vs. FKRCX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FSAGX (Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio) and FKRCX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund) are both Gold funds. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX returned 10.62%/yr vs 14.12%/yr for FKRCX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSAGX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FKRCX.

Performance

FSAGX vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly lower than FKRCX's -1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX has underperformed FKRCX with an annualized return of 10.62%, while FKRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.

FSAGX

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -3.05%
• YTD: -2.07%
• 6M: -6.88%
• 1Y: 50.39%
• 3Y*: 40.63%
• 5Y*: 16.97%
• 10Y*: 10.62%

FKRCX

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: -1.84%
• 6M: -5.57%
• 1Y: 74.96%
• 3Y*: 52.41%
• 5Y*: 21.73%
• 10Y*: 14.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAGX vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	-2.07%	143.05%	14.97%	-0.37%	-13.46%	-10.44%	26.83%	35.50%	-13.00%	8.63%
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund	-1.84%	196.59%	17.64%	2.03%	-23.47%	-4.03%	44.30%	51.48%	-18.11%	-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAGX and FKRCX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1985	0.91

The correlation between FSAGX and FKRCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSAGX vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAGX

FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 18
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

FKRCX

FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 34
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAGX vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSAGX	FKRCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.74	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	2.11	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.29	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	2.21	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.95	6.07	-2.12

FSAGX vs. FKRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the FKRCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAGX and FKRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSAGX vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, roughly equal to the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and FKRCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSAGX	FKRCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.21%	-78.85%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.40%	-34.78%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.40%	-34.78%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.94%	-48.79%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.57%	-49.54%	-1.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.29%	-27.05%	-1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.34%	-33.73%	+0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.09%	12.61%	+0.48%

Volatility

FSAGX vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) have volatilities of 17.04% and 16.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSAGX	FKRCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.04%	16.59%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.83%	37.75%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.10%	44.23%	+0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.10%	34.31%	-0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.39%	33.13%	+0.26%

FSAGX vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FKRCX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSAGX vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison

FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, less than FKRCX's 10.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund	10.95%	10.75%	13.44%	3.12%	0.00%	9.37%	10.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	8.73%
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	5.24%	2.17%	3.62%	0.99%	0.36%	1.60%	4.40%	0.40%	0.00%	0.22%	3.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSAGX and FKRCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FSAGX and FKRCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSAGX or FKRCX?

FSAGX has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to FKRCX (16.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAGX dropped -77.21% vs FKRCX's -78.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.