PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRTY vs. GLRY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRTY vs. GLRY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) and Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRTY achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than GLRY's 17.07% return.


FRTY

1D
-0.76%
1M
10.48%
YTD
12.43%
6M
12.10%
1Y
30.04%
3Y*
23.96%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*

GLRY

1D
0.36%
1M
2.25%
YTD
17.07%
6M
15.71%
1Y
29.59%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRTY vs. GLRY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
12.43%12.82%38.86%16.81%-42.23%2.07%
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
17.07%16.50%16.59%19.58%-22.50%-5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FRTY and GLRY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2021

0.74

The correlation between FRTY and GLRY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

FRTY vs. GLRY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FRTY
GLRY

Technology

24.1%
32.3%

Healthcare

20.2%
8.1%

Industrials

14.5%
24.6%

Communication Services

13.5%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
11.9%

Energy

6.6%
2.5%

Utilities

6.0%
3.0%

Financial Services

4.5%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Real Estate

-

2.6%

Technology

FRTY
24.1%
GLRY
32.3%

Healthcare

FRTY
20.2%
GLRY
8.1%

Industrials

FRTY
14.5%
GLRY
24.6%

Communication Services

FRTY
13.5%
GLRY
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FRTY
8.0%
GLRY
11.9%

Energy

FRTY
6.6%
GLRY
2.5%

Utilities

FRTY
6.0%
GLRY
3.0%

Financial Services

FRTY
4.5%
GLRY
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

FRTY
1.0%
GLRY
1.4%

Basic Materials

FRTY

-

GLRY
1.8%

Real Estate

FRTY

-

GLRY
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRTY vs. GLRY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRTY
FRTY Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

GLRY
GLRY Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GLRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLRY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GLRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLRY Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRTY vs. GLRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) and Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRTYGLRYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.73

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.97

9.48

-5.51

FRTY vs. GLRY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the GLRY Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRTY and GLRY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRTYGLRYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.64

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.44

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.52

-0.38

Drawdowns

FRTY vs. GLRY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRTY drawdown since its inception was -53.15%, which is greater than GLRY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRTY and GLRY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRTYGLRYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.15%

-40.60%

-12.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.75%

-10.89%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

-20.50%

-10.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.15%

-34.63%

-18.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

0.00%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.97%

-16.04%

-11.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

3.13%

+4.46%

Volatility

FRTY vs. GLRY - Volatility Comparison

Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) at 5.62%. This indicates that FRTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRTYGLRYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

5.62%

+3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.38%

15.14%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.86%

18.19%

+7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.19%

20.06%

+7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.11%

21.41%

+5.70%

FRTY vs. GLRY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRTY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GLRY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRTY vs. GLRY - Dividend Comparison

FRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than GLRY's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FRTY
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF
0.17%0.19%0.10%0.00%0.00%5.35%
GLRY
Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF
0.24%0.34%0.52%1.07%1.04%4.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRTY and GLRY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRTY has higher volatility (9.01%) compared to GLRY (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRTY dropped -53.15% vs GLRY's -40.60%.

On 5-year performance, GLRY leads with 8.81% vs 4.95% for FRTY. On fees, FRTY is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GLRY has been the lower-risk option at 5.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLRY has performed better with a 8.81% return vs 4.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FRTY is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GLRY.

GLRY has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.17% for FRTY.

FRTY is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while GLRY is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Alger Group Holdings LLC and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FRTY and 0.85% for GLRY.

GLRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRTY and GLRY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer