FRTY vs. JSML
FRTY (Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF) and JSML (Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRTY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alger Group Holdings LLC, while JSML is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index. FRTY is actively managed, while JSML is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRTY returned 5.27%/yr vs 6.32%/yr for JSML. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRTY charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JSML.
Performance
FRTY vs. JSML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRTY achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than JSML's 20.06% return.
FRTY
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 12.03%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 12.79%
- 1Y
- 33.42%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- —
JSML
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 20.06%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 36.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
FRTY vs. JSML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF | 13.29% | 12.82% | 38.86% | 16.81% | -42.23% | 2.07% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 20.06% | 13.41% | 12.45% | 30.09% | -29.40% | -5.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRTY and JSML is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FRTY and JSML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
FRTY vs. JSML - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FRTY
JSML
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FRTY
JSML
Healthcare
FRTY
JSML
Industrials
FRTY
JSML
Communication Services
FRTY
JSML
Consumer Cyclical
FRTY
JSML
Energy
FRTY
JSML
Utilities
FRTY
JSML
-
Financial Services
FRTY
JSML
Consumer Defensive
FRTY
JSML
Basic Materials
FRTY
-
JSML
Real Estate
FRTY
-
JSML
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRTY vs. JSML — Risk / Return Rank
FRTY
JSML
FRTY vs. JSML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) and Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRTY | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.69 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 2.34 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 2.49 | -0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 8.87 | -4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRTY | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.69 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.26 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.57 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
FRTY vs. JSML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRTY drawdown since its inception was -53.15%, which is greater than JSML's maximum drawdown of -39.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRTY and JSML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRTY | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.15% | -39.65% | -13.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.75% | -14.84% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -25.60% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.15% | -37.91% | -15.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.99% | -10.87% | -17.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.59% | 4.17% | +3.42% |
Volatility
FRTY vs. JSML - Volatility Comparison
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) at 7.47%. This indicates that FRTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JSML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRTY | JSML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 7.47% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.40% | 16.03% | +2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.86% | 21.54% | +4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.19% | 24.34% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.12% | 24.27% | +2.85% |
FRTY vs. JSML - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRTY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JSML's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRTY vs. JSML - Dividend Comparison
FRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than JSML's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF | 0.17% | 0.19% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.80% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRTY and JSML have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRTY has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to JSML (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRTY dropped -53.15% vs JSML's -39.65%.
On 5-year performance, JSML leads with 6.32% vs 5.27% for FRTY. On fees, JSML is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JSML has been the lower-risk option at 7.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JSML has performed better with a 6.32% return vs 5.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSML is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FRTY.
JSML has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.17% for FRTY.
FRTY is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while JSML is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alger Group Holdings LLC and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FRTY and 0.30% for JSML.
JSML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRTY and JSML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer