FRTY vs. RFG
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG).
FRTY and RFG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FRTY is an actively managed fund by Alger Group Holdings LLC. It was launched on Feb 26, 2021. RFG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Growth. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FRTY or RFG.
Key characteristics
| FRTY | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 41.10% | 25.28% |
| 1Y Return | 56.23% | 35.56% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.36% | 2.68% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.50 | 1.91 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.15 | 2.64 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.11 | 1.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.67 | 8.23 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.65% | 4.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.88% | 18.93% |
| Max Drawdown | -55.59% | -51.93% |
| Current Drawdown | -24.55% | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRTY and RFG is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FRTY vs. RFG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FRTY achieves a 41.10% return, which is significantly higher than RFG's 25.28% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRTY vs. RFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRTY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RFG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FRTY vs. RFG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FRTY vs. RFG - Dividend Comparison
FRTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFG Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | 0.54% | 0.99% | 0.78% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.64% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.35% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.65% |
Drawdowns
FRTY vs. RFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRTY drawdown since its inception was -55.59%, which is greater than RFG's maximum drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRTY and RFG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FRTY vs. RFG - Volatility Comparison
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) at 5.52%. This indicates that FRTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.