FRTY vs. VRT
FRTY (Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alger, while VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FRTY returned 2.37%/yr vs 53.98%/yr for VRT. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
FRTY vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRTY achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 49.17% return.
FRTY
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 12.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.49%
VRT
- 1D
- 6.18%
- 1M
- -19.62%
- 6M
- 29.81%
- YTD
- 49.17%
- 1Y
- 70.80%
- 3Y*
- 109.07%
- 5Y*
- 53.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 49.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $353.31K | $584.27K | $524.74K | |
| $1.93B | $1.68B | $1.97B |
FRTY vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF | 5.48% | 12.82% | 38.86% | 16.81% | -42.23% | 2.46% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 49.17% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 19.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRTY and VRT is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2021 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FRTY and VRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRTY vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
FRTY
VRT
FRTY vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRTY | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.22 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 1.63 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 5.58 | -4.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRTY vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRTY drawdown since its inception was -53.15%, smaller than the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRTY and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRTY | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.15% | -71.24% | +18.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.75% | -40.70% | +20.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -61.28% | +29.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.15% | -71.24% | +18.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.52% | -35.78% | +25.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.30% | -16.29% | -11.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 12.00% | -3.91% |
Volatility
FRTY vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) is 9.32%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 24.48%. This indicates that FRTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRTY | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.32% | 24.48% | -15.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.49% | 52.93% | -31.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.75% | 64.52% | -36.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.66% | 63.43% | -35.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 55.31% | -27.98% |
Dividends
FRTY vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
FRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, more than VRT's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRTY Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF | 0.18% | 0.19% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.35% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.09% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRTY and VRT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (24.48%) compared to FRTY (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRTY dropped -53.15% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRTY and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer